Hasting v. Woodford et al

Filing 3

ORDER of INTRADISTRICT TRANSFER from Sacramento (2:06cv1347 MCE KJM (HC) ) to Fresno (1:06cv0824 OWW TAG (HC) ) signed by Judge Kimberly J. Mueller on 6/26/06. All Future filing shall reference the new Fresno Case Number: 1:06cv0824 OWW TAG (HC). CASE CLOSED. (Donati, J)

Download PDF
(HC) Hasting v. Woodford et al Doc. 3 Case 2:06-cv-01347-MCE-KJM Document 3 Filed 06/27/2006 Page 1 of 2 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 vs. J. WOODFORD, et al., Respondents. / Petitioner, a state prisoner proceeding pro se, has filed an application for a writ of habeas corpus under 28 U.S.C. 2254. In his application, petitioner challenges a conviction issued by the Madera County Superior Court. Madera County is part of the Fresno Division of the United States District Court for the Eastern District of California. See Local Rule 3-120(d). As provided by Local Rule 3-120(f), a civil action which has not been commenced in the proper division of a court may, on the court's own motion, be transferred to the proper division of the court. Therefore, this action will be transferred to the Fresno Division of the court. ///// ///// ///// 1 Dockets.Justia.com IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA ERIC HASTING, Petitioner, No. CIV S-06-1347 MCE KJM P ORDER Case 2:06-cv-01347-MCE-KJM Document 3 Filed 06/27/2006 Page 2 of 2 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 /mp hast1347.109 Good cause appearing, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that: 1. This action is transferred to the United States District Court for the Eastern District of California sitting in Fresno; and 2. All future filings shall reference the new Fresno case number assigned and shall be filed at: United States District Court Eastern District of California 2500 Tulare Street Fresno, CA 93721 DATED: June 26, 2006. ______________________________________ UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE 2

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?