Antoine v. County of Sacramento
Filing
170
STIPULATION and ORDER signed by Judge William B. Shubb on 1/7/09 ORDERING the Status Conference reset for 2/23/09 at 02:00 pm in Courtroom 5 (WBS) before Judge William B. Shubb. (Becknal, R)
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24
Randolph Cregger & Chalfant
RANDOLPH, CREGGER & CHALFANT LLP Robert L. Chalfant, State Bar No. 203051 Wendy Motooka, State Bar No. 233589 1030 G Street Sacramento, California 95814 Telephone: (916) 443-4443 Facsimile: (916) 443-2124 Attorneys for Defendants DARIN GRIEM, CHRIS BAKER, JOSEPH REEVE, BRIAN WADE, and CHRISTOPHER BRITTON
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
DON ANTOINE, Plaintiff, vs. COUNTY OF SACRAMENTO, SIX UNKNOWN AGENTS OF THE COUNTY OF SACRAMENTO, and DOES 1 through 25, inclusive, Defendants.
No. 2:06-CV-01349-WBS-GGH STIPULATION TO CONTINUE STATUS CONFERENCE; ORDER
/ WHEREAS on December 4, 2008, this Court issued an order setting a status conference for January 26, 2009, at 2:00 p.m.; and WHEREAS defendants' counsel is currently set for a ten-day trial in the District Court before Judge Karlton, commencing on January 21, 2009; THE PARTIES NOW HEREBY STIPULATE, with the Court's leave, to continue the status conference date to February 23, 2009 at 2:00 p.m. // // 1
STIPULATION TO CONTINUE STATUS CONFERENCE
25 26
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24
Randolph Cregger & Chalfant
DATED: January 5, 2009
RANDOLPH CREGGER & CHALFAT LLP
/s/ Robert L. Chalfant ROBERT L. CHALFANT Attorneys for Defendants DARIN GRIEM, CHRIS BAKER, JOSEPH REEVE, BRIAN WADE, and CHRISTOPHER BRITTON
DATED: January 5, 2009
LAW OFFICES OF DARREN J. KESSLER
/s/ Darren J. Kessler DARREN J. KESSLER Attorneys for Plaintiff DON ANTOINE
DATED: January 5, 2009
SCOTT LAW FIRM
/s/ Lizabeth N. de Vries LIZABETH N. de VRIES Attorneys for Plaintiff DON ANTOINE
IT IS SO ORDERED.
25 26
DATED: January 7, 2009
2
STIPULATION TO CONTINUE STATUS CONFERENCE
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?