Miller v. High Desert State Prison et al

Filing 3

ORDER signed by Judge Craig M. Kellison on 7/5/06 ORDERING that pltf shall submit w/in 30 days, a completed application to proceed IFP or the appropriate filing fee; and the Clerk is DIRECTED to send plft a new IFP Application. (Brown, T)

Download PDF
(PC) Miller v. High Desert State Prison et al Doc. 3 Case 2:06-cv-01437-GEB-CMK Document 3 Filed 07/07/2006 Page 1 of 2 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 Defendants. 16 / 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 Plaintiff, a state prisoner proceeding pro se, brings this civil rights action pursuant to 42 U.S.C. 1983. Plaintiff has not, however, filed an application to proceed in forma pauperis or paid the required filing fee. See 28 U.S.C. 1914(a), 1915(a). Plaintiff will be provided the opportunity to submit either a completed application to proceed in forma pauperis or the appropriate filing fee. Plaintiff is warned that failure to comply with this order may result in the dismissal of this action. See Local Rule 11-110. /// /// /// 1 Dockets.Justia.com IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA ERNEST MILLER, Plaintiff, vs. HIGH DESERT STATE PRISON, et al., No. CIV S-06-1437-GEB-CMK-P ORDER Case 2:06-cv-01437-GEB-CMK Document 3 Filed 07/07/2006 Page 2 of 2 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 Accordingly, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that: 1. Plaintiff shall submit on the form provided by the Clerk of the Court, within 30 days from the date of this order, a complete application for leave to proceed in forma pauperis, including the required affidavits and certifications, or the appropriate filing fee; and 2. The Clerk of the Court is directed to send plaintiff a new form Application to Proceed In Forma Pauperis By a Prisoner. DATED: July 5, 2006. ______________________________________ CRAIG M. KELLISON UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE 2

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?