Adventist Health System (AHS) et al v. Clark

Filing 5

FINDINGS and RECOMMENDATIONS signed by Judge Kimberly J. Mueller on 7/7/06 recommending that the above-entitled action be summarily remanded to the Superior Court of CA, County of Placer. Objections to the F&R are due within 20 days after being served with the F&R. (Kastilahn, A) Modified on 7/11/2006 (Krueger, M).

Download PDF
(PS) Adventist Health System (AHS) et al v. Clark Doc. 5 Case 2:06-cv-01467-FCD-KJM Document 5 Filed 07/07/2006 Page 1 of 2 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 vs. BARBARA CLARK, Defendant. / Defendant has filed a notice of removal of a state court petition of employer for injunction prohibiting violence or threats of violence against employee in which plaintiff seeks a stay away order against defendant. There is no basis for federal subject matter jurisdiction evident in the state court action. Under 28 U.S.C. 1447(c), this action should therefore be summarily remanded. Accordingly, IT IS HEREBY RECOMMENDED that the above-entitled action be summarily remanded to the Superior Court of California, County of Placer. These findings and recommendations are submitted to the United States District Judge assigned to the case, pursuant to the provisions of 28 U.S.C. 636(b)(l). Within twenty days after being served with these findings and recommendations, any party may file written objections with the court and serve a copy on all parties. Such a document should be captioned 1 Dockets.Justia.com IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA ADVENTIST HEALTH SYSTEM, et al., Plaintiffs, No. CIV S-06-1467 LKK KJM PS FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATIONS Case 2:06-cv-01467-FCD-KJM Document 5 Filed 07/07/2006 Page 2 of 2 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 "Objections to Magistrate Judge's Findings and Recommendations." Any reply to the objections shall be served and filed within ten days after service of the objections. The parties are advised that failure to file objections within the specified time may waive the right to appeal the District Court's order. Martinez v. Ylst, 951 F.2d 1153 (9th Cir. 1991). DATED: July 7, 2006. ______________________________________ UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE 006 clark1 472. rem 2

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?