Rouser v. Tilton et al
ORDER signed by Senior Judge Lawrence K. Karlton on 12/23/09 ORDERING that, upon reconsideration, the 76 order of the magistrate judge is AFFIRMED. (Engbretson, K.)
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 vs. JAMES E. TILTON, et al., Defendants. / On December 3, 2009, plaintiff filed a request for reconsideration of the magistrate judge's order filed November 17, 2009, denying plaintiff's motion for law library access. Pursuant to E.D. Local Rule 303(f), a magistrate judge's orders shall be upheld unless "clearly erroneous or contrary to law." Upon review of the entire file, the court finds that it does not appear that the magistrate judge's ruling was clearly erroneous or contrary to law. Therefore, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that, upon reconsideration, the order of the magistrate judge filed November 17, 2009, is affirmed. DATED: December 23, 2009. ORDER WILLIAM ROUSER, Plaintiff, No. CIV S-06-1527 LKK GGH P IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?