Soto v. Greyhound Lines et al

Filing 168

STIPULATION and ORDER signed by Judge Morrison C. England, Jr on 9/8/09 ORDERING the complaint is DISMISSED against dft Greyhound Lines, Inc. ONLY. (Carlos, K)

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28

Walter H. Walker, III (SBN 63117) Clarissa E. Kearns (SBN 244732) WALKER, HAMILTON & KOENIG LLP 50 Francisco Street, Ste. 460 San Francisco, CA 94133 Telephone: [phone] Facsimile: 415/986-1618 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA SACRAMENTO DIVISION

MARIA SOTO, Plaintiffs, v. GREYHOUND LINES, INC., et al. Defendants. And Related Actions

Case No. 2:06-01612-MCE-DAD (Consolidated Cases) STIPULATION FOR VOLUNTARY DISMISSAL OF PART OF ACTION; ORDER [Fed. R. Civ. P. 41(a)(1)(A)(ii)]

Pursuant to Rule 41(a)(1)(A)(ii) of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure, it is hereby stipulated by and between plaintiff MARIA SOTO, defendant ENTERPRISE RENT-ACAR, defendant TU PHUOC NGUYEN, and defendant GREYHOUND LINES, INC., by and through their undersigned counsel, that plaintiff MARIA SOTO's complaint is dismissed with prejudice as to defendant GREYHOUND LINES, INC., only. The dismissal is based on the fact that a mutually agreed upon settlement has been reached on all issues between plaintiff MARIA SOTO and defendant GREYHOUND LINES, Inc. This action does not require court approval for dismissal pursuant to any statute of the United States, and because it is not a class action (Fed. R. Civ. P. 23(e)) and no equity receiver has been appointed (Fed. R. Civ. P. 66).

S o to v. Greyhound Lines, Inc., et al. S tip u la tio n for Dismissal; Order C a se No.: 2:06-01612-MCE-DAD

-1-

1 2 3 4 5

IT IS HEREBY STIPULATED. Dated: June 2, 2009 Walker, Hamilton & Koenig LLP ____/s/________________________ Clarissa Kearns Attorneys for plaintiff Maria Soto Dated: June 2, 2009 Lombardi Loper & Conant LLP ____/s/_______________________ Karen Giquinto Attorneys for defendant Greyhound Lines, Inc Dated: June 2, 2009 Field & Sanders ____/s/_______________________ David Sanders Co-counsel for defendants & crosscomplainants Tu Phuoc Nguyen, and Enterprise Rent-A-Car Dated: June 2, 2009 Murchison & Cummings LLP ____/s/________________________ Heidi Quan Co-counsel for defendants & crosscomplainants Tu Phuoc Nguyen, and Enterprise Rent-A-Car

6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 IT IS SO ORDERED. 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28
S o to v. Greyhound Lines, Inc., et al. S tip u la tio n for Dismissal; Order C a se No.: 2:06-01612-MCE-DAD

Dated: September 8, 2009 ________________________________ MORRISON C. ENGLAND, JR. UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

-2-