Dunn v. USA et al

Filing 8

ORDER of INTRADISTRICT TRANSFER from Sacramento (2:06-cv-01659 MCE PAN) to Fresno (1:06-cv-1130 OWW SMS) signed by Judge John F. Moulds on 8/22/06. (Girgis, C)

Download PDF
(HC) Dunn v. USA et al Doc. 8 Case 2:06-cv-01659-MCE-EFB Document 8 Filed 08/24/2006 Page 1 of 2 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 1 Dockets.Justia.com IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA COREY D. DUNN, Petitioner, vs. USA, et al., Respondents. / Petitioner, an individual detained on pending criminal charges and awaiting trial in state court, has filed an application for a writ of habeas corpus pursuant to 28 U.S.C. 2254.1 Petitioner has paid the filing fee. In his application, petitioner seeks relief from pending criminal proceedings by the Stanislaus County Superior Court. Stanislaus County is part of the Fresno Division of the United States District Court for the Eastern District of California. See Local Rule 3-120(d). ORDER No. CIV S-06-1659 MCE PAN P As a general rule, the federal writ of habeas corpus will not extend to one awaiting trial unless special circumstances exist such that there is an absence of state processes effective to protect a federal right. See Ex Parte Royall, 117 U.S. 241, 245-254 (1886); Fay v. Noia, 372 U .S. 391, 420 (1963), overruled in part by Wainwright v. Sykes, 433 U.S. 72 (1977) and Coleman v. Thompson, 501 U.S. 722 (1991). Petitioner does not allege an absence of state processes. 1 Case 2:06-cv-01659-MCE-EFB Document 8 Filed 08/24/2006 Page 2 of 2 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 Pursuant to Local Rule 3-120(f), a civil action which has not been commenced in the proper division of a court may, on the court's own motion, be transferred to the proper division of the court. Therefore, this action will be transferred to the Fresno Division of the court. This court will not rule on petitioner's request to proceed in forma pauperis. Good cause appearing, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that: 1. This court has not ruled on petitioner's request to proceed in forma pauperis; 2. This action is transferred to the United States District Court for the Eastern District of California sitting in Fresno; and 3. All future filings shall reference the new Fresno case number assigned and shall be filed at: United States District Court Eastern District of California 2500 Tulare Street Fresno, CA 93721 DATED: August 22, 2006. 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 2 14 dunn1659.109

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?