Williams v. San Mateo Police et al

Filing 4

ORDER signed by Judge Gregory G. Hollows on 8/17/06 ORDERING the CASE TRANSFERRED to the Northern District of California. This Court has not ruled on Plaintiff's 2 Motion to Proceed IFP. Original file, certified copy of transfer order, and docket sheet sent. CASE CLOSED. (Donati, J)

Download PDF
(PC) Williams v. San Mateo Police et al Doc. 4 Case 2:06-cv-01744-LKK-GGH Document 4 Filed 08/17/2006 Page 1 of 2 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 vs. SAN MATEO POLICE, et al., Defendants. / Plaintiff, a state prisoner proceeding pro se, has filed a civil rights action pursuant to 42 U.S.C. 1983, together with a request to proceed in forma pauperis. In light of 1996 amendments to 28 U.S.C. 1915, this court will not rule on plaintiff's request to proceed in forma pauperis. The federal venue statute requires that a civil action, other than one based on diversity jurisdiction, be brought only in "(1) a judicial district where any defendant resides, if all defendants reside in the same State, (2) a judicial district in which a substantial part of the events or omissions giving rise to the claim occurred, or a substantial part of property that is the subject of the action is situated, or (3) a judicial district in which any defendant may be found, if there is no district in which the action may otherwise be brought." 28 U.S.C. 1391(b). ///// 1 Dockets.Justia.com IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA VINCENT E. WILLIAMS, Plaintiff, No. CIV S-06-1744 LKK GGH P ORDER Case 2:06-cv-01744-LKK-GGH Document 4 Filed 08/17/2006 Page 2 of 2 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 GGH:bb will1744.21 In this case, none of the defendants reside in this district. The claim arose in San Mateo County, which is in the Northern District of California. Therefore, plaintiff's claim should have been filed in the United States District Court for the Northern District of California. In the interest of justice, a federal court may transfer a complaint filed in the wrong district to the correct district. See 28 U.S.C. 1406(a); Starnes v. McGuire, 512 F.2d 918, 932 (D.C. Cir. 1974). Accordingly, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that: 1. This court has not ruled on plaintiff's request to proceed in forma pauperis; and 2. This matter is transferred to the United States District Court for the Northern District of California. DATED: 8/17/06 /s/ Gregory G. Hollows GREGORY G. HOLLOWS UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE 2

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?