El-Shaddai v. Wheeler et al

Filing 44

ORDER signed by Judge Frank C. Damrell, Jr on 01/21/09 ADOPTING 40 FINDINGS and RECOMMENDATIONS. The Plaintiff's June 11, 2008, 29 motion for a temporary order and preliminary injunction is DENIED. (Streeter, J) Modified on 1/23/2009 (Streeter, J).

Download PDF
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA ADONAI EL-SHADDAI, a.k.a., JAMES WILKERSON, Plaintiff, vs. B. WHEELER, et al., Defendants. / Plaintiff, a state prisoner proceeding pro se, has filed this civil rights action seeking relief under 42 U.S.C. § 1983. The matter was referred to a United States Magistrate Judge pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)(B) and Local General Order No. 262. On October 28, 2008, the magistrate judge filed findings and recommendations herein which were served on all parties and which contained notice to all parties that any objections to the findings and recommendations were to be filed within fourteen days from the date the findings and recommendations were served. Plaintiff has filed objections to the findings and recommendations. In accordance with the provisions of 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)(C) and Local Rule 72304, this court has conducted a de novo review of this case. Having carefully reviewed the 1 ORDER No. CIV S-06-1898 FCD EFB P 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 entire file, the court finds the findings and recommendations to be supported by the record and by proper analysis. Accordingly, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that: 1. The findings and recommendations filed October 28, 2008, are adopted in full; and 2. Plaintiff's June 11, 2008, motion for a temporary restraining order and preliminary injunction is denied. So ordered. DATED: January 21, 2009. _______________________________________ FRANK C. DAMRELL, JR. UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE 2

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?