L.H. et al v. Schwarzenegger et al
ORDER signed by Senior Judge Lawrence K. Karlton on 2/19/2009. Plaintiffs' 499 Motion to Monitor defendants' compliance with Permanent Injunction Hearing is CONTINUED to 4/20/2009 at 10:00 AM in Courtroom 4 (LKK). Defendants' Opposit ion or Statement of Non-Opposition shall be filed no later than 3/25/2009; plaintiffs' Reply, if any, shall be filed no later than 4/6/2009. Plaintiffs' 519 Proposed Order for interim monitoring of various juvenile parole proceedings one day per week is DENIED without prejudice. (Marciel, M)
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 The court is in receipt of defendants' request to continue the hearing date for plaintiffs' motion to monitor defendants' v. ARNOLD SCHWARZENEGGER, Governor, State of California, et al, Defendants. / L.H., A.Z., D.K., and D.R., on behalf of themselves and all other similarly situated juvenile parolees in California, NO. CIV. S-06-2042 LKK/GGH Plaintiffs, ORDER UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
compliance with the permanent injunction, as well as plaintiffs' response and defendants' objection thereto. Due to the court's scheduling exigencies, the hearing on plaintiffs' motion is
CONTINUED to April 20, 2009 at 10:00 AM. Defendants' opposition or statement of non-opposition shall be filed not later than March 25, 2009. Plaintiffs' reply, if any, shall be filed not later than 1
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26
April 6, 2009. Plaintiffs represent that they do not oppose the continuance so long as in the interim the plaintiffs' counsel are permitted to monitor various juvenile parole proceedings one day per week. A determination of whether this is warranted and appropriate is the central issue of plaintiffs' motion and therefore the court finds that granting the request would be premature. Plaintiffs' request is DENIED without prejudice. IT IS SO ORDERED. DATED: February 19, 2009.
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?