Perez v. Sisto et al

Filing 93

ORDER signed by Magistrate Judge Gregory G. Hollows on 7/18/2011 DENYING 91 Motion to Appoint Counsel. (Zignago, K.)

Download PDF
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 9 FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 JOSE MANUEL PEREZ, Plaintiff, 11 12 vs. 13 No. CIV S-06-2090 KJM GGH P D.K. SISTO, et al., Defendants. 14 ORDER / 15 Plaintiff is a prison inmate proceeding pro se and in forma pauperis with a civil 16 17 rights action. On July 11, 2011, plaintiff filed his fourth request for the appointment of counsel. 18 Plaintiff’s previous requests were filed on April 22, 2008, February 5, 2009 and August 24, 2010. 19 All requests were denied. The issues presented (excessive force and failure to protect) are not 20 beyond the ability of this pro se defendant to present at trial. In light of those orders, and because 21 the undersigned continues to find that exceptional circumstances to warrant this court’s 22 requesting voluntary assistance of counsel for plaintiff are not present in this case, Terrell v. 23 Brewer, 935 F.2d 1015, 1017 (9th Cir. 1991); Wood v. Housewright, 900 F.2d 1332, 1335-36 24 (9th Cir. 1990), the request will be denied. 25 //// 26 //// Accordingly, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that plaintiff’s July 11, 2011 request is 1 2 denied. 3 DATED: July 18, 2011 GREGORY G. HOLLOWS UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE 4 5 GGH009/:md pere2090.31.thr 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 /s/ Gregory G. Hollows

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?