Norman v. Dovey et al
ORDER signed by Magistrate Judge Dale A. Drozd on 07/01/09 granting 28 Motion extension of time. Within 60 days of the date of service of this order, petitioner shall file a 3rd amended petition. (Plummer, M)
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 vs. JOHN DOVEY, et al., Respondents. / On January 29, 2009, the court dismissed petitioner's second amended petition and granted him thirty days leave to file a third amended petition. On April 23, 2009, the court granted petitioner an additional thirty days leave to file a third amended petition. The thirty day period expired, but petitioner failed to file a third amended petition or otherwise respond to the court's order. Accordingly, on June 10, 2009, the court issued findings and recommendations, recommending dismissal of this action. Petitioner has filed objections to the court's findings and recommendations and requests an additional sixty days leave to file a third amended petition. In the interest of justice, the court will grant petitioner a final sixty days leave to file a third amended petition. However, the court will not vacate its findings and ///// ///// 1 ORDER IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA CHARLES GLENN NORMAN, JR., Petitioner, No. CIV S-06-2235 MCE DAD P
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26
recommendations at this time. If petitioner fails to file a timely third amended petition, the court will forward its findings and recommendations to the assigned district judge. Accordingly, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that: 1. Petitioner's June 24, 2009 request for an extension of time (Doc. No. 28) is granted; and 2. Within sixty days of the date of service of this order, petitioner shall file a third amended petition. If petitioner fails to file a third amended petition, the court will forward the findings and recommendations to the assigned district judge. DATED: July 1, 2009.
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?