Giraldes v. Roche et al

Filing 94

ORDER signed by Magistrate Judge Craig M. Kellison on 7/27/2010 ORDERING that this case is SET for a Settlement Conference before Magistrate Judge Nandor J. Vandas on 8/12/10 at 9:00 am at CSP-Sol; parties to appear w/ full settlement authority; parties' confidential settlement conference statements due no later than 8/5/2010; the clerk to serve a courtesy copy of this order on the Litigation Office at CSP-SOL. (cc: Judge Vandas) (Yin, K)

Download PDF
(PC) Giraldes v. Roche et al Doc. 94 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 LARRY GIRALDES, 11 Plaintiff, 12 vs. 13 ROCHE, et al., 14 Defendants. 15 / 16 Plaintiff is a prisoner proceeding pro se with an action under 42 U.S.C. 1983. This case 17 will be referred to Magistrate Judge Nandor J. Vadas to conduct a settlement conference at 18 California State Prison, Solano (CSP-SOL), on August 12, 2010, at 9:00 a.m. 19 In accordance with the above, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that: 20 1. This case is set for a settlement conference before Magistrate Judge Nandor J. 21 Vadas on August 12, 2010, at 9:00 a.m. at CSP-SOL, 2100 Peabody Road, Vacaville, California 22 95696. 23 2. Parties are to appear with full settlement authority. 24 3. The parties are directed to provide confidential settlement conference 25 statements to the Honorable Nandor J. Vadas, U.S. District Court-Northern District of California, 26 1 Dockets.Justia.com IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA Case No. 2:06-CV-2277 MCE CMK P ORDER 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 514 H Street, Eureka, CA 95502 or via email at NJVpo@cand.uscourts.gov, so that they arrive no later than August 5, 2010. 4. The Clerk of the Court is directed to serve a courtesy copy of this order on the Litigation Office at CSP-SOL, via facsimile at (707) 454-3429. DATED: July 27, 2010 ______________________________________ CRAIG M. KELLISON UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE 2

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?