USA v. 8258 West Nicolet Avenue, Glendale, Maricopa County, Arizona, APN: 142-27-156-4

Filing 6

RELATED CASE ORDER 5 signed by Judge Frank C. Damrell Jr. on 10/26/06. Action denominated 2:06-CV-2305 LKK GGH is REASSIGNED to Judge Frank C. Damrell and Magistrate Judge Kimberley J. Mueller for all further proceedings. Any dates currently set are VACATED. Documents filed in case shall be shown as 2:06-CV-2305 FCD KJM and Clerk to make appropriate adjustment.(Marciel, M)

Download PDF
USA v. 8258 West Nicolet Avenue, Glendale, Maricopa County, Arizona, APN: 142-27-156-4 Doc. 6 Case 2:06-cv-02305-FCD-KJM Document 6 Filed 10/27/2006 Page 1 of 3 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 UNITED STATES OF AMERICA 11 Plaintiff, 12 v. 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 UNITED STATES OF AMERICA 20 Plaintiff, 21 v. 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 /// Defendant. _______________________________________/ REAL PROPERTY LOCATED AT 7407 NORTH 82nd LANE, GLENDALE, MARICOPA COUNTY, ARIZONA, ASSESSOR'S TAX PARCEL NUMBER: 142-27-171-1, INCLUDING ALL APPURTENANCES AND IMPROVEMENTS THERETO, No. CIV S-06-2300 GEB EFB REAL PROPERTY LOCATED AT 7600 NORTH 71st AVENUE, GLENDALE, MARICOPA COUNTY, ARIZONA, ASSESSOR'S TAX PARCEL NUMBER: 143-25-044, INCLUDING ALL APPURTENANCES AND IMPROVEMENTS THERETO, Defendant. _______________________________________/ RELATED CASE ORDER No. CIV S-06-2299 FCD KJM UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA Dockets.Justia.com Case 2:06-cv-02305-FCD-KJM Document 6 Filed 10/27/2006 Page 2 of 3 1 UNITED STATES OF AMERICA 2 Plaintiff, 3 v. 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 v. 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 The court has received the Notice of Related Cases filed October 23, 2006. Examination 20 of the above-entitled actions reveals that all actions are related within the meaning of Local Rule 21 83-123(a) (E.D. Cal. 1997). The actions involved are based on the same or similar claims, the 22 same property transaction or event, similar questions of fact and the same questions of law, and 23 would therefore entail a substantial duplication of labor if heard by different judges. 24 Accordingly, the assignment of the matters to the same judge is likely to effect a substantial 25 savings of judicial effort and is also likely to be convenient for the parties. 26 The parties should be aware that relating the cases under Local Rule 83-123 merely has 27 the result that these actions are assigned to the same judge; no consolidation of the actions is 28 effected. Under the regular practice of this court, related cases are generally assigned to the Defendant. _____________________________________/ REAL PROPERTY LOCATED AT 8779 WEST LANE AVENUE, GLENDALE, MARICOPA COUNTY, ARIZONA, ASSESSOR'S TAX PARCEL NUMBER: 142-28-050, INCLUDING ALL APPURTENANCES AND IMPROVEMENTS THERETO, Defendant. _____________________________________/ UNITED STATES OF AMERICA Plaintiff, No. CIV S-06-2306 DFL GGH REAL PROPERTY LOCATED AT 8258 WEST NICOLET AVENUE, GLENDALE, MARICOPA COUNTY, ARIZONA, ASSESSOR'S TAX PARCEL NUMBER: 142-27-156-4, INCLUDING ALL APPURTENANCES AND IMPROVEMENTS THERETO, No. CIV S-06-2305 LKK GGH Case 2:06-cv-02305-FCD-KJM Document 6 Filed 10/27/2006 Page 3 of 3 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 judge and magistrate judge to whom the first filed action was assigned. IT IS THEREFORE ORDERED that the actions denominated, CIV S-06-2300 GEB EFB, CIV S-06-2305 LKK GGH and CIV S-06-2306 DFL GGH are reassigned to Judge Frank C. Damrell, Jr. and Magistrate Judge Kimberly J. Mueller for all further proceedings, and any dates currently set in these reassigned cases only are hereby VACATED. Henceforth, the caption on documents filed in the reassigned cases shall be shown as, CIV S-06-2300 FCD KJM, CIV S-06-2305 FCD KJM and CIV S-06-2306 FCD KJM. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that the Clerk of Court make appropriate adjustment in the assignment of civil/criminal cases to compensate for this reassignment. IT IS SO ORDERED. DATED: October 26, 2006 /s/ Frank C. Damrell Jr. FRANK C. DAMRELL, JR. United States District Judge

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?