Brodheim v. Dickinson, et. al.

Filing 106

ORDER signed by Magistrate Judge Gregory G. Hollows on 3/6/13 ORDERING that Respondent's 79 MOTION to DISMISS is reinstated; Respondent shall file an opposition by June 21, 2013. Should the Governor affirm the Boards decision prior to this date, petitioner shall file a statement to this effect in place of an opposition. A reply may be filed by June 28, 2013. The motion will then be taken under submission without a hearing.(Dillon, M)

Download PDF
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 9 FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 MICHAEL J. BRODHEIM, 11 12 13 Petitioner, No. CIV S-06-2326 LKK GGH P vs. KATHLEEN DICKINSON, et al., 14 Respondents. 15 ORDER / 16 Previously pending on this court’s law and motion calendar for February 28, 2013, 17 was petitioner’s request to vacate motions and scheduling dates, filed January 24, 2013, based on 18 the Board of Parole Hearings’ grant of parole. Having reviewed respondent’s opposition and 19 heard oral argument, the court now issues the following order.1 20 For reasons stated at hearing, IT IS ORDERED that: 21 1. Respondent’s motion to dismiss, filed September 26, 2011, is reinstated. 22 2. Respondent shall file an opposition by June 21, 2013. Should the Governor 23 affirm the Board’s decision prior to this date, petitioner shall file a statement to this effect in 24 place of an opposition. 25 1 26 By order of January 29, 2013, the court vacated respondent’s previously scheduled motion to dismiss from the February 28, 2013 calendar. 1 1 3. A reply may be filed by June 28, 2013. The motion will then be taken under 2 submission without a hearing. 3 DATED: March 6, 2013 4 /s/ Gregory G. Hollows UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE 5 6 7 8 GGH:076/brod2326.sch.wpd 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 2

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?