Brodheim v. Dickinson, et. al.
Filing
141
ORDER signed by Magistrate Judge Gregory G. Hollows on 3/12/2014 ORDERING that within 14 days, the parties shall address why, in light of the Gilman decision, there is any remedy left in this habeas corpus case that could possibly be invoked; both parties shall file a response that is ten pages or less in length. (Yin, K)
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
8
FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
9
10
MICHAEL BRODHEIM,
11
12
13
No. 2:06-cv-2326 LKK GGH P
Petitioner,
v.
ORDER
KATHLEEN DICKINSON, et al.,
14
Respondents.
15
16
On February 28, 2014, the district court issued an order in Gilman v. Brown, No. 2:05-cv-
17
0830 LKK CKD, which determined parole issues in the civil rights context that may be pertinent
18
to this case. (Id., ECF No. 532.)
19
Accordingly, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that: within fourteen (14) days of this order, the
20
parties shall address why, in light of the Gilman decision, there is any remedy left in this habeas
21
corpus case that could possibly be invoked. Both parties shall file a response that is ten pages or
22
less in length.
23
Dated: March 12, 2014
24
/s/ Gregory G. Hollows
25
UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE
26
27
28
GGH:076/Brod2326.Gil
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?