Brodheim v. Dickinson, et. al.

Filing 141

ORDER signed by Magistrate Judge Gregory G. Hollows on 3/12/2014 ORDERING that within 14 days, the parties shall address why, in light of the Gilman decision, there is any remedy left in this habeas corpus case that could possibly be invoked; both parties shall file a response that is ten pages or less in length. (Yin, K)

1
2
3
4
5
6
7

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

8

FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

9
10

MICHAEL BRODHEIM,

11
12
13

No. 2:06-cv-2326 LKK GGH P

Petitioner,
v.

ORDER

KATHLEEN DICKINSON, et al.,

14

Respondents.

15
16

On February 28, 2014, the district court issued an order in Gilman v. Brown, No. 2:05-cv-

17

0830 LKK CKD, which determined parole issues in the civil rights context that may be pertinent

18

to this case. (Id., ECF No. 532.)

19

Accordingly, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that: within fourteen (14) days of this order, the

20

parties shall address why, in light of the Gilman decision, there is any remedy left in this habeas

21

corpus case that could possibly be invoked. Both parties shall file a response that is ten pages or

22

less in length.

23

Dated: March 12, 2014

24

/s/ Gregory G. Hollows

25

UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE

26
27
28

GGH:076/Brod2326.Gil