Brodheim v. Dickinson, et. al.
ORDER signed by Magistrate Judge Gregory G. Hollows on 3/17/11 ORDERING that Petitioner and respondent shall file a joint status report within 21 days detailing what claims remain to be decided after remand, and what process is necessary to decide them.(Dillon, M)
(HC) Brodheim v. Dickinson, et. al.
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA MICHAEL J. BRODHEIM, Petitioner, vs. M. VEAL, et al., Respondents. / Petitioner and respondent shall file a joint status report within twenty-one days detailing what claims remain to be decided after remand, and what process is necessary to decide them. If the parties cannot agree, the respective disagreements shall be set forth separately in the joint statement. If a party, or the parties, believe that this case can proceed on the same issues present in the Gilman class action referenced in the undersigned's findings and recommendations, the belief that this habeas case can proceed with the same issues being adjudicated in the Gilman case shall be supported by legal authority. DATED: 03/17/2011 /s/ Gregory G. Hollows UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE ORDER No. CIV S-06-2326 LKK GGH P
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?