Brodheim v. Dickinson, et. al.

Filing 75

ORDER signed by Magistrate Judge Gregory G. Hollows on 5/24/2011 ORDERING that in response to the 72 court's order, Judge Gregory G. Hollows will not require a joint status report re claims that remain to be decided and the process necessary to decide them until such time as a mandate from the Ninth Circuit may issue. (Yin, K)

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

9

FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

10

MICHAEL J. BRODHEIM,

11

Petitioner,

12

vs.

13

No. CIV S-06-2326 LKK GGH P

M. VEAL, et al.,

14

Respondents.

15

ORDER
/

16

In response the court’s order, filed on March 18, 2011, directing petitioner and

17

respondent to file a joint status report detailing the claims remaining to be decided after remand,

18

the parties filed a joint status report on April 8, 2011, stating that since petitioner/appellee still

19

has motions pending before the Ninth Circuit which have yet to be ruled on and no mandate has

20

yet issued, this court lacks jurisdiction. Accordingly, the undersigned will not require a joint

21

status report regarding claims that remain to be decided and the process necessary to decide them

22

until such time as a mandate from the Ninth Circuit may issue.

23
24

IT IS SO ORDERED.
DATED: May 24, 2011

25
26

GGH:009
brod2326.ord2

/s/ Gregory G. Hollows
___________________________________
UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE