Brodheim v. Dickinson, et. al.
ORDER signed by Magistrate Judge Gregory G. Hollows on 5/24/2011 ORDERING that in response to the 72 court's order, Judge Gregory G. Hollows will not require a joint status report re claims that remain to be decided and the process necessary to decide them until such time as a mandate from the Ninth Circuit may issue. (Yin, K)
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
MICHAEL J. BRODHEIM,
No. CIV S-06-2326 LKK GGH P
M. VEAL, et al.,
In response the court’s order, filed on March 18, 2011, directing petitioner and
respondent to file a joint status report detailing the claims remaining to be decided after remand,
the parties filed a joint status report on April 8, 2011, stating that since petitioner/appellee still
has motions pending before the Ninth Circuit which have yet to be ruled on and no mandate has
yet issued, this court lacks jurisdiction. Accordingly, the undersigned will not require a joint
status report regarding claims that remain to be decided and the process necessary to decide them
until such time as a mandate from the Ninth Circuit may issue.
IT IS SO ORDERED.
DATED: May 24, 2011
/s/ Gregory G. Hollows
UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?