Brodheim v. Dickinson, et. al.
ORDER signed by Magistrate Judge Gregory G. Hollows on 5/27/11 ORDERING petitioner and respondent to file a joint status report within 21 days detailing what claims remain to be decided after remand, and what process is necessary to decide them.(Dillon, M)
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
MICHAEL J. BRODHEIM,
No. CIV S-06-2326 LKK GGH P
M. VEAL, et al.,
The mandate from the Ninth Circuit having issued on May 24, 2011, petitioner
and respondent are now ORDERED to file a joint status report within twenty-one days detailing
what claims remain to be decided after remand, and what process is necessary to decide them. If
the parties cannot agree, the respective disagreements shall be set forth separately in the joint
statement. If a party, or the parties, believe that this case can proceed on the same issues present
in the Gilman class action referenced in the undersigned’s findings and recommendations, the
belief that this habeas case can proceed with the same issues being adjudicated in the Gilman
case shall be supported by legal authority.
DATED: May 27, 2011
/s/ Gregory G. Hollows
UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?