Brodheim v. Dickinson, et. al.

Filing 76

ORDER signed by Magistrate Judge Gregory G. Hollows on 5/27/11 ORDERING petitioner and respondent to file a joint status report within 21 days detailing what claims remain to be decided after remand, and what process is necessary to decide them.(Dillon, M)

1
2
3
4
5
6
7

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

8

FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

9

MICHAEL J. BRODHEIM,

10

Petitioner,

11

vs.

12

No. CIV S-06-2326 LKK GGH P

M. VEAL, et al.,

13

Respondents.

14
15

ORDER
/

The mandate from the Ninth Circuit having issued on May 24, 2011, petitioner

16

and respondent are now ORDERED to file a joint status report within twenty-one days detailing

17

what claims remain to be decided after remand, and what process is necessary to decide them. If

18

the parties cannot agree, the respective disagreements shall be set forth separately in the joint

19

statement. If a party, or the parties, believe that this case can proceed on the same issues present

20

in the Gilman class action referenced in the undersigned’s findings and recommendations, the

21

belief that this habeas case can proceed with the same issues being adjudicated in the Gilman

22

case shall be supported by legal authority.

23

DATED: May 27, 2011

24
GGH:009/brod2326.ord3

25
26

/s/ Gregory G. Hollows
___________________________________
UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE