Brodheim v. Dickinson, et. al.
Filing
93
ORDER signed by Magistrate Judge Gregory G. Hollows on 06/18/12 ordering that petitioner shall file any opposition to the amended motion to dismiss and any cross-motion for an evidentiary hearing on or before 07/27/12; respondents' reply to the opposition and to any cross-motion should be filed on or before 08/28/12; any reply by petitioner to an opposition to any cross-motion must be filed on or before 09/11/12; argument on the amended motion shall be heard on 09/20/12 at 10:00 a.m. in courtroom 9. (Plummer, M)
1
2
3
4
5
DANIEL J. BRODERICK, #89424
Federal Defender
DAVID M. PORTER, Bar #127024
Assistant Federal Defender
801 I Street, 3rd Floor
Sacramento, California 95814
Telephone: (916) 498-5700
Attorney for Petitioner
MICHAEL BRODHEIM
6
7
8
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
9
FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
)
)
)
Petitioner,
)
)
v.
)
)
KATHLEEN DICKINSON, et al.,
)
)
Respondents.
)
_______________________________ )
MICHAEL J. BRODHEIM,
ORDER
Judge: Honorable Gregory G.
Hollows
ORDER
17
18
No. 2:06-cv-2326 LKK GGH P
Pursuant to the stipulated request of the parties, and good
19
cause appearing therefor, IT IS ORDERED that petitioner shall
20
file any opposition to the amended motion to dismiss and any
21
cross-motion for an evidentiary hearing on or before July 27,
22
2012; respondents’ reply to the opposition and to any
23
cross-motion should be filed on or before August 28, 2012; any
24
reply by petitioner to an opposition to any cross-motion must be
25
filed on or before September 11, 2012; argument on the amended
26
/ / /
27
28
1
motion shall be heard on September 20, 2012, at 10:00 a.m., in
2
Courtroom 9.
3
DATED:
June 18, 2012
/s/ Gregory G. Hollows
4
UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE
5
6
brod2326.brf
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
2
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?