Brodheim v. Dickinson, et. al.

Filing 93

ORDER signed by Magistrate Judge Gregory G. Hollows on 06/18/12 ordering that petitioner shall file any opposition to the amended motion to dismiss and any cross-motion for an evidentiary hearing on or before 07/27/12; respondents' reply to the opposition and to any cross-motion should be filed on or before 08/28/12; any reply by petitioner to an opposition to any cross-motion must be filed on or before 09/11/12; argument on the amended motion shall be heard on 09/20/12 at 10:00 a.m. in courtroom 9. (Plummer, M)

Download PDF
1 2 3 4 5 DANIEL J. BRODERICK, #89424 Federal Defender DAVID M. PORTER, Bar #127024 Assistant Federal Defender 801 I Street, 3rd Floor Sacramento, California 95814 Telephone: (916) 498-5700 Attorney for Petitioner MICHAEL BRODHEIM 6 7 8 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 9 FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 ) ) ) Petitioner, ) ) v. ) ) KATHLEEN DICKINSON, et al., ) ) Respondents. ) _______________________________ ) MICHAEL J. BRODHEIM, ORDER Judge: Honorable Gregory G. Hollows ORDER 17 18 No. 2:06-cv-2326 LKK GGH P Pursuant to the stipulated request of the parties, and good 19 cause appearing therefor, IT IS ORDERED that petitioner shall 20 file any opposition to the amended motion to dismiss and any 21 cross-motion for an evidentiary hearing on or before July 27, 22 2012; respondents’ reply to the opposition and to any 23 cross-motion should be filed on or before August 28, 2012; any 24 reply by petitioner to an opposition to any cross-motion must be 25 filed on or before September 11, 2012; argument on the amended 26 / / / 27 28 1 motion shall be heard on September 20, 2012, at 10:00 a.m., in 2 Courtroom 9. 3 DATED: June 18, 2012 /s/ Gregory G. Hollows 4 UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE 5 6 brod2326.brf 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 2

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?