Campbell v. PriceWaterhouse Coopers, LLP

Filing 506

ORDER signed by Judge Lawrence K. Karlton on 12/15/11: The December 19, 2011 hearing on the motion 500 is VACATED without prejudice. (Kaminski, H)

1
2
3
4
5
6
7

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

8

FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

9
10
11
12

JASON CAMPBELL and
SARAH SOBEK, individually,
and on behalf of all other
similarly situated current
and former employees of
PricewaterhouseCoopers, LLP,,
NO. CIV. S-06-2376 LKK/GGH

13
Plaintiffs,
14
v.
15
16

PRICEWATERHOUSECOOPERS, LLP,
a Limited Liability Partnership;,
and DOES 1-100, inclusive,

O R D E R

17
Defendant.
/

18
19

Plaintiffs have filed a “Notice of Motion for Protective

20

Order,” pursuant to E.D. Cal. R. (“Local Rule”) 251, applicable to

21

discovery motions.

22

Statement re Discovery Disagreement” or affidavit required by that

23

rule.1

24

(Dkt. No. 500) is VACATED without prejudice.

However, plaintiffs have not filed the “Joint

Accordingly, the December 19, 2011 hearing on the motion

25
26

1

The court also notes that discovery is closed.
1

1

If plaintiffs wish to re-notice the motion, they may do so,

2

but they must comply with Local Rule 230, applicable to motions on

3

the court’s civil law and motion calendar.

4

IT IS SO ORDERED.

5

DATED:

December 15, 2011.

6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
2