Campbell v. PriceWaterhouse Coopers, LLP

Filing 521

STIPULATION AND ORDER signed by Judge Lawrence K. Karlton on 2/21/12: HEARING as to 507 MOTION for PROTECTIVE ORDER RESET for 3/12/2012 at 10:00 AM in Courtroom 4 (LKK) before Judge Lawrence K. Karlton. (Kaminski, H)

Download PDF
1 2 3 4 William A. Kershaw, SBN 057486 Lyle W. Cook, SBN 148914 Stuart C. Talley, SBN 180374 KERSHAW, CUTTER & RATINOFF, LLP 401 Watt Avenue Sacramento, CA 95864 Telephone: 916-448-9800 Facsimile: 916-669-4499 5 Attorneys for Plaintiffs 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 NORMAN C. HILE, SBN 57299 nhile@orrick.com JULIE A. TOTTEN, SBN166470 jatotten@orrick.com DAVID A. PRAHL, SBN 233583 dprahl@orrick.com ORRICK, HERRINGTON & SUTCLIFFE LLP 400 Capitol Mall, Suite 3000 Sacramento, California 95814-4497 Telephone: (916) 447-9200 Facsimile: (916) 329-4900 Attorneys for Defendant PRICEWATERHOUSECOOPERS LLP 14 15 DANIEL J. THOMASCH (Admitted Pro Hac Vice) dthomasch@gibsondunn.com LAUREN J. ELLIOT (Admitted Pro HacVice) lelliot@gibsondunn.com GIBSON DUNN & CRUTCHER LLP 200 Park Avenue New York, New York 10166-0193 Telephone: (212) 351-4000 Facsimile: (212) 351-4035 JULIAN W. POON, SBN 219843 jpoon@gibsondunn.com ALEXANDER K. MIRCHEFF, SBN 245074 amircheff@gibsondunn.com GIBSON, DUNN & CRUTCHER LLP 333 South Grand Avenue Los Angeles, California 90071-3197 Telephone: (213) 229-7000 Facsimile: (213) 229-7520 MICHELE L. MARYOTT, SBN 191993 mmaryott@gibsondunn.com GIBSON, DUNN & CRUTCHER LLP 3161 Michelson Drive Irvine, California 92612-4412 Telephone: (949) 451-3800 Facsimile: (949) 451-4220 16 Attorneys for Defendant PRICEWATERHOUSECOOPERS LLP 17 18 19 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 20 EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 21 22 JASON CAMPBELL, et al., 23 Plaintiffs, 24 25 26 27 v. Case No. 06-CV-02376 LKK GGH STIPULATION AND ORDER TO CONTINUE HEARING DATE ON PLAINTIFFS' MOTION FOR PROTECTIVE ORDER PRICEWATERHOUSECOOPERS, LLP, a Limited Liability Partnership, and DOES 1100, inclusive, Defendant. 28 STIPULATION AND ORDER TO CONTINUE HEARING DATE ON PLAINTIFFS’ MOTION FOR PROTECTIVE ORDER 06-CV-02376 LKK GGH 1 Plaintiffs JASON CAMPBELL and SARAH SOBEK, individually and on behalf of the 2 previously certified class of unlicensed California Attest Associates, and Defendant 3 PricewaterhouseCoopers LLP (“PwC”), through their respective attorneys of record, hereby 4 stipulate as follows: 5 6 7 8 9 WHEREAS, a hearing on Plaintiffs’ Motion for Protective Order was originally scheduled for January 17, 2012 and subsequently scheduled for February 13, 2012; WHEREAS, the Court subsequently continued the hearing on Plaintiffs’ Motion for Protective Order from February 13, 2012 to February 27, 2012 at 10:00 a.m.; WHEREAS, PwC’s counsel is scheduled to commence trial in the Eastern District of 10 Virginia on February 27, 2012 and, thus, is not available for the hearing on Plaintiffs’ Motion for 11 Protective Order on that date. 12 ACCORDINGLY, IT IS HEREBY STIPULATED AND AGREED by and between 13 Plaintiffs and PwC that the Hearing on Plaintiffs’ Motion for Protective Order be continued from 14 February 27, 2012 to March 12, 2012 at 10:00 a.m. 15 Dated: February 16, 2012 16 17 18 19 20 DANIEL J. THOMASCH LAUREN J. ELLIOT MICHELE MARYOTT JULIAN POON Gibson Dunn & Crutcher LLP NORMAN C. HILE JULIE A. TOTTEN DAVID A. PRAHL ANDREA L. BROWN Orrick, Herrington & Sutcliffe LLP 21 22 23 24 By: /s/Daniel J. Thomasch DANIEL J. THOMASCH Attorneys for Defendant PRICEWATERHOUSECOOPERS LLP 25 26 27 28 -1- STIPULATION AND ORDER TO CONTINUE HEARING DATE ON PLAINTIFFS’ MOTION FOR PROTECTIVE ORDER 06-CV-02376 LKK GGH 1 Dated: February 16, 2012 KERSHAW, CUTTER & RATINOFF, LLP 2 3 4 By: /s/William A. Kershaw WILLIAM A. KERSHAW Attorneys for Plaintiffs 5 6 7 IT IS SO ORDERED. 8 Dated: February 21, 2012 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 -2- STIPULATION AND ORDER TO CONTINUE HEARING DATE ON PLAINTIFFS’ MOTION FOR PROTECTIVE ORDER 06-CV-02376 LKK GGH

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?