Campbell v. PriceWaterhouse Coopers, LLP
Filing
521
STIPULATION AND ORDER signed by Judge Lawrence K. Karlton on 2/21/12: HEARING as to 507 MOTION for PROTECTIVE ORDER RESET for 3/12/2012 at 10:00 AM in Courtroom 4 (LKK) before Judge Lawrence K. Karlton. (Kaminski, H)
1
2
3
4
William A. Kershaw, SBN 057486
Lyle W. Cook, SBN 148914
Stuart C. Talley, SBN 180374
KERSHAW, CUTTER & RATINOFF, LLP
401 Watt Avenue
Sacramento, CA 95864
Telephone: 916-448-9800
Facsimile: 916-669-4499
5
Attorneys for Plaintiffs
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
NORMAN C. HILE, SBN 57299
nhile@orrick.com
JULIE A. TOTTEN, SBN166470
jatotten@orrick.com
DAVID A. PRAHL, SBN 233583
dprahl@orrick.com
ORRICK, HERRINGTON & SUTCLIFFE LLP
400 Capitol Mall, Suite 3000
Sacramento, California 95814-4497
Telephone:
(916) 447-9200
Facsimile:
(916) 329-4900
Attorneys for Defendant
PRICEWATERHOUSECOOPERS LLP
14
15
DANIEL J. THOMASCH
(Admitted Pro Hac Vice)
dthomasch@gibsondunn.com
LAUREN J. ELLIOT
(Admitted Pro HacVice)
lelliot@gibsondunn.com
GIBSON DUNN & CRUTCHER LLP
200 Park Avenue
New York, New York 10166-0193
Telephone: (212) 351-4000
Facsimile:
(212) 351-4035
JULIAN W. POON, SBN 219843
jpoon@gibsondunn.com
ALEXANDER K. MIRCHEFF, SBN 245074
amircheff@gibsondunn.com
GIBSON, DUNN & CRUTCHER LLP
333 South Grand Avenue
Los Angeles, California 90071-3197
Telephone: (213) 229-7000
Facsimile:
(213) 229-7520
MICHELE L. MARYOTT, SBN 191993
mmaryott@gibsondunn.com
GIBSON, DUNN & CRUTCHER LLP
3161 Michelson Drive
Irvine, California 92612-4412
Telephone: (949) 451-3800
Facsimile:
(949) 451-4220
16
Attorneys for Defendant
PRICEWATERHOUSECOOPERS LLP
17
18
19
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
20
EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
21
22
JASON CAMPBELL, et al.,
23
Plaintiffs,
24
25
26
27
v.
Case No. 06-CV-02376 LKK GGH
STIPULATION AND ORDER TO
CONTINUE HEARING DATE ON
PLAINTIFFS' MOTION FOR
PROTECTIVE ORDER
PRICEWATERHOUSECOOPERS, LLP, a
Limited Liability Partnership, and DOES 1100, inclusive,
Defendant.
28
STIPULATION AND ORDER TO CONTINUE HEARING DATE ON
PLAINTIFFS’ MOTION FOR PROTECTIVE ORDER
06-CV-02376 LKK GGH
1
Plaintiffs JASON CAMPBELL and SARAH SOBEK, individually and on behalf of the
2
previously certified class of unlicensed California Attest Associates, and Defendant
3
PricewaterhouseCoopers LLP (“PwC”), through their respective attorneys of record, hereby
4
stipulate as follows:
5
6
7
8
9
WHEREAS, a hearing on Plaintiffs’ Motion for Protective Order was originally scheduled
for January 17, 2012 and subsequently scheduled for February 13, 2012;
WHEREAS, the Court subsequently continued the hearing on Plaintiffs’ Motion for
Protective Order from February 13, 2012 to February 27, 2012 at 10:00 a.m.;
WHEREAS, PwC’s counsel is scheduled to commence trial in the Eastern District of
10
Virginia on February 27, 2012 and, thus, is not available for the hearing on Plaintiffs’ Motion for
11
Protective Order on that date.
12
ACCORDINGLY, IT IS HEREBY STIPULATED AND AGREED by and between
13
Plaintiffs and PwC that the Hearing on Plaintiffs’ Motion for Protective Order be continued from
14
February 27, 2012 to March 12, 2012 at 10:00 a.m.
15
Dated: February 16, 2012
16
17
18
19
20
DANIEL J. THOMASCH
LAUREN J. ELLIOT
MICHELE MARYOTT
JULIAN POON
Gibson Dunn & Crutcher LLP
NORMAN C. HILE
JULIE A. TOTTEN
DAVID A. PRAHL
ANDREA L. BROWN
Orrick, Herrington & Sutcliffe LLP
21
22
23
24
By: /s/Daniel J. Thomasch
DANIEL J. THOMASCH
Attorneys for Defendant
PRICEWATERHOUSECOOPERS LLP
25
26
27
28
-1-
STIPULATION AND ORDER TO CONTINUE HEARING DATE ON
PLAINTIFFS’ MOTION FOR PROTECTIVE ORDER
06-CV-02376 LKK GGH
1
Dated: February 16, 2012
KERSHAW, CUTTER & RATINOFF, LLP
2
3
4
By: /s/William A. Kershaw
WILLIAM A. KERSHAW
Attorneys for Plaintiffs
5
6
7
IT IS SO ORDERED.
8 Dated: February 21, 2012
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
-2-
STIPULATION AND ORDER TO CONTINUE HEARING DATE ON
PLAINTIFFS’ MOTION FOR PROTECTIVE ORDER
06-CV-02376 LKK GGH
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?