Campbell v. PriceWaterhouse Coopers, LLP

Filing 638

ORDER signed by District Judge Troy L. Nunley on 12/3/2014 ORDERING 637 Defendant's Motion to modify scheduling order to permit PWC to file a motion to decertify the class before trial is hereby DENIED. (Reader, L)

Download PDF
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 9 EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 11 12 13 JASON CAMPBELL and SARAH SOBEK, individually, and on behalf of all other similarly situated current and former employees of PricewaterhouseCoopers, LLP, 14 15 16 17 18 19 No. 06-CV-02376-TLN-AC ORDER Plaintiffs, v. PRICEWATERHOUSECOOPERS, LLP, a Limited Liability Partnership, Defendant. The Court is in receipt of Defendant PricewaterhouseCoopers LLP’s (“PwC”) motion to 20 modify the scheduling order to permit PwC to file a motion to decertify the class before trial. 21 (ECF No. 637.) This Court has already ruled on this issue. (See Judge Karlton’s Order, ECF No. 22 557.) Furthermore, to the extent that PwC argues that the Ninth Circuit’s decision in Brady v. 23 Deloitte & Touche, No. 12-16384, 2014 WL 5033214 (9th Cir. Oct. 9, 2014), requires 24 decertification of the class at issue, this Court does not agree. 25 In Brady, the Ninth Circuit reviewed the district court’s decision to decertify the class for 26 an abuse of discretion. In doing so, the panel stated “[w]e limit our review to whether the district 27 court correctly selected and applied Rule 23’s criteria. An abuse of discretion occurs when the 28 district court relies upon an improper factor, omits consideration of a factor entitled to substantial 1 1 weight, or mulls the correct mix of factors but makes a clear error of judgment in assaying them.” 2 Id. at *1 (internal citations and quotations omitted). Accordingly, PwC’s motion to modify the 3 scheduling order to permit PwC to file a motion to decertify the class before trial (ECF No. 637) 4 is hereby DENIED. 5 6 IT IS SO ORDERED. 7 8 Dated: December 3, 2014 9 10 11 12 Troy L. Nunley United States District Judge 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 2

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?