McDonald v. Campbell, et al

Filing 220

JUDGMENT for defendants Lewis, Campbell, Gibson and Baker against plaintiff signed by Senior Judge Robert J. Timlin on 10/18/2011.(Waggoner, D)

Download PDF
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 9 EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 11 JEFFREY D. McDONALD, 12 Plaintiff, 13 14 15 16 v. ROSEANNE CAMPBELL, et al. Defendants. ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) CV 06-02404- RT JUDGMENT FOR ALL DEFENDANTS AGAINST PLAINTIFF ON THE FIRST AMENDED COMPLAINT 17 On May 27, 2008, defendant Correctional Officer Lewis and defendant Roseanne Campbell 18 in her individual capacity were dismissed from this action by order of the court. 19 On April 2, 2010, the court ordered that summary judgment be granted in favor of defendant 20 C. Gibson and defendant Roseanne Campbell in her official capacity as warden of Mule Creek State 21 Prison, as to all claims in the First Amended Complaint (“FAC”) by plaintiff against them. 22 On October 6, 2011, a jury returned a special verdict in favor of defendant Jeffrey Baker on 23 the claim in the FAC by plaintiff against him. 24 Accordingly, IT IS ORDERED that: 1) judgment be entered in favor of defendants 25 Correctional Officer Lewis, Roseanne Campbell, in her individual capacity and in her official 26 capacity, C. Gibson and Jeffrey Baker and against plaintiff Jeffrey McDonald on all claims by him 27 against them in the FAC; 2) Plaintiff Jeffrey McDonald shall take nothing against the defendants in 28 1 this action; and 3) defendants Correctional Officer Lewis, Roseanne Campbell, C. Gibson and 2 Jeffrey Baker shall recover from Plaintiff Jeffrey McDonald their costs of suit in the amount of 3 $____________. 4 5 DATE: October 18, 2011 6 ROBERT J. TIMLIN United States District Judge 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 2

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?