McDonald v. Campbell, et al

Filing 82

ORDER DENYING 81 Motion to Stay without prejudice. (Manzer, C)

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA Sacramento Division CIVIL MINUTES - GENERAL
Case No. Title: PRESENT: THE HONORABLE ROBERT J. TIMLIN, JUDGE Patricia Gomez Courtroom Clerk ATTORNEYS PRESENT FOR PLAINTIFFS: None None Court Reporter ATTORNEYS PRESENT FOR DEFENDANTS: None 2:06-2404-RT Jeffrey McDonald v. Roseanne Campbell, et al. Date July 17, 2009

PROCEEDINGS: ORDER DENYING WITHOUT PREJUDICE PLAINTIFF'S M O T IO N FOR COURT TO STAY DEFENDANTS CAMPBELL AND GIBSON'S M O T IO N FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT DUE TO INCOMPLETE DISCOVERY THAT I S IN PLAINTIFF'S MOTION TO COMPEL T h e Court has read and considered Plaintiff's motion for the court to stay the Defendants C am p b ell and Gibson's motion for summary judgment due to incomplete discovery that is in Plaintiff's m o tio n to compel, filed July 13, 2009 ("motion"). It appears to the Court that Plaintiff may not have re c eiv e d 1) the Court's order granting in part and denying in part Plaintiff's motion to compel and d e n yin g Plaintiff's request for sanctions, 2) the Court's notice to pro se Plaintiff McDonald regarding p ro c e d u re s for opposing motion for summary judgment pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 56 a n d 3) the notice of extended dates for filing opposition and reply to the summary judgment motion. The aforementioned court order and notices were filed on July 6, 2009. T h e Court denies the motion without prejudice and directs the Clerk of the court to send Plaintiff M c D o n a ld copes of the order and notices filed July 6, 2009, mentioned above. IT IS SO ORDERED.

C I V I L MINUTES

I N I T I A L S OF CRD _____