Cromwell v. Prosper et al

Filing 7

ORDER signed by Magistrate Judge Gregory G. Hollows on 11/12/09 ORDERING that petitioner must show cause, within 21 days, why the stay in this matter should not be lifted.(Dillon, M)

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 vs. K. PROSPER, et al., Respondents. / Petitioner pro se filed a habeas petition pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 2254 on November 1, 2006. In an Order, filed on February 7, 2007, adopting the Findings and Recommendations, filed on December 4, 2006, the petition was stayed pending exhaustion of petitioner's fourth ground for relief and petitioner was therein directed to inform the court of the state supreme court's decision within 30 days of a decision being rendered, after which the matter was to proceed. It has been more than two and one-half years with no further word from petitioner. \\\\\ \\\\\ \\\\\ \\\\\ 1 ORDER IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA LANCE ARMAN CROMWELL, Petitioner, No. CIV S-06-2412 FCD GGH P

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26
GGH:009 crom2412.osc

Accordingly, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that petitioner must show cause, within 21 days, why the stay in this matter should not be lifted. DATED: November 12, 2009 /s/ Gregory G. Hollows UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE

2