Glass v. Sisto et al

Filing 27

ORDER ADOPTING REPORT and RECOMMENDATIONS signed by Chief Judge Robert H. Whaley on 4/9/2009 re 25 Report and Recommendations; petition for writ of habeas corpus is DENIED; judgment is entered in favor of Respondent and against Petitioner. CASE CLOSED. (Gaydosh, J)

Download PDF
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 On January 15, 2009, Magistrate Judge Hutton entered a Report and 15 Recommendation, recommending that Petitioner's Petition Under 28 U.S.C. § 16 2254 For Writ of Habeas Corpus by a Person in State Custody (Ct. Rec. 1) be 17 denied (Ct. Rec. 25). No objections have been filed. Having reviewed the Report and Recommendation and the files and records 18 19 herein, the Court adopts the Magistrate Judge's Report and Recommendation in its 2 0 entirety. 21 22 Accordingly, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED: 1. The Report and Recommendation to Deny Writ of Habeas Corpus (Ct. UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA VONZELL R. GLASS, Petitioner, v. D.K. SISTO, Warden, et al., Respondent. NO. CV-06-2555-RHW-JPH ORDER ADOPTING REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION TO DENY WRIT OF HABEAS CORPUS 23 Rec. 25) is ADOPTED, in its entirety. 2. Petitioner's Petitioner under 28 U.S.C. § 2254 For Writ of Habeas 24 25 Corpus by a Person in State Custody (Ct. Rec. 1) is DENIED. 3. Judgment is entered in favor of Respondent and against Petitioner. 26 2 7 /// 2 8 /// ORDER ADOPTING REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION TO DENY WRIT OF HABEAS CORPUS ~ 1 1 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 IT IS SO ORDERED. The District Court Executive is directed to enter this DATED this 9th day of April, 2009. S/ Robert H. Whaley ROBERT H. WHALEY United States District Judge 2 Order, forward copies to Petitioner and counsel, and close the file. Q:\CAED cases\Glass\adoptrr2.wpd ORDER ADOPTING REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION TO DENY WRIT OF HABEAS CORPUS ~ 2

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?