Jones v. Kramer

Filing 15

ORDER signed by Judge John A. Mendez on 2/18/09 ORDERING that the 14 findings and recommendations filed December 8, 2008, are adopted in full. This action is dismissed. CASE CLOSED. (Duong, D)

Download PDF
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 vs. M. C. KRAMER, Respondent. / Petitioner, a state prisoner proceeding pro se, has filed an application for a writ of habeas corpus pursuant to 28 U.S.C. 2254. The matter was referred to a United States Magistrate Judge pursuant to 28 U.S.C. 636(b)(1)(B) and Local General Order No. 262. On December 8, 2008, the magistrate judge filed findings and recommendations herein which were served on petitioner and which contained notice to petitioner that any objections to the findings and recommendations were to be filed within twenty days. Petitioner has not filed objections to the findings and recommendations. The court has reviewed the file and finds the findings and recommendations to be supported by the record and by the magistrate judge's analysis. Accordingly, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that: ///// 1 ORDER IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA JAMES BERNARD JONES, JR., Petitioner, No. CIV S-06-2583 JAM EFB P 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 full; and 1. The findings and recommendations filed December 8, 2008, are adopted in 2. This action is dismissed. See Fed. R. Civ. P. 41(b); Rule 11 of the Rules Governing Section 2254 Cases; L. R. 11-110. DATED: February 18, 2009 /s/ John A. Mendez UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE 2

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?