Isgrigg v. CDC

Filing 3

ORDER signed by Judge Edmund F. Brennan on 12/7/06 ORDERING CASE TRANSFERRED to USDC Northern District of California. Certified copy of Order sent to Northern District. CASE CLOSED (Krueger, M)

Download PDF
(PC) Isgrigg v. CDC Doc. 3 Case 2:06-cv-02720-GEB-EFB Document 3 Filed 12/08/2006 Page 1 of 2 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 CDC, Defendant. / Plaintiff is a prisoner without counsel seeking relief for alleged civil rights violations. See 42 U.S.C. 1983. The court has reviewed the papers plaintiff filed and, for the reasons stated, finds that this action should have been filed in a different district. A civil action, other than one based on diversity jurisdiction, must be brought in "(1) a judicial district where any defendant resides, if all defendants reside in the same State, (2) a judicial district in which a substantial part of the events or omissions giving rise to the claim occurred, or a substantial part of property that is the subject of the action is situated, or (3) a judicial district in which any defendant may be found, if there is no district in which the action may otherwise be brought." 28 U.S.C. 1391(b). //// ORDER vs. IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA RICHARD LAWRENCE ISGRIGG, Plaintiff, No. CIV S-06-2720 GEB EFB P Dockets.Justia.com Case 2:06-cv-02720-GEB-EFB Document 3 Filed 12/08/2006 Page 2 of 2 Here, most defendants are located in Monterey County and the claim arose in Monterey 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 County, California which is in the Northern District of California. 28 U.S.C. 84(a). Therefore, pursuant to 28 U.S.C. 1404(a), this action is transferred to the United States District Court for the Northern District of California. See 28 U.S.C. 1404(a); Starnes v. McGuire, 512 F.2d 918, 932 (D.C. Cir. 1974). So ordered. Dated: December 7, 2006.

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?