Nelson v. Sisto et al

Filing 3

ORDER signed by Judge Kimberly J. Mueller on 12/20/06 ORDERING that the petitioner shall submit an affidavit in support of request to proceed IFP or the filing fee; Clerk is to send petitioner a new IFP form.(Manzer, C)

Download PDF
(HC) Nelson v. Sisto et al Doc. 3 Case 2:06-cv-02809-RRB-KJM Document 3 Filed 12/21/2006 Page 1 of 2 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 vs. D.K. SISTO, Warden, et al., Respondents. / Petitioner, a state prisoner proceeding pro se, has filed an application for a writ of habeas corpus pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 2254. Petitioner has not, however, filed an in forma pauperis affidavit or paid the required filing fee ($5.00). See 28 U.S.C. §§ 1914(a), 1915(a). Petitioner will be provided the opportunity to either submit the appropriate affidavit in support of a request to proceed in forma pauperis or submit the appropriate filing fee. In accordance with the above, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that: 1. Petitioner shall submit, within thirty days from the date of this order, an affidavit in support of his request to proceed in forma pauperis or the appropriate filing fee; petitioner's failure to comply with this order will result in the dismissal of this action; and ///// ///// 1 Dockets.Justia.com IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA SCOTT LANE NELSON, Petitioner, No. CIV S-06-2809 DFL KJM P ORDER Case 2:06-cv-02809-RRB-KJM Document 3 Filed 12/21/2006 Page 2 of 2 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 /mp nels2809.101a 2. The Clerk of the Court is directed to send petitioner a copy of the in forma pauperis form used by this district. DATED: December 20, 2006. 2

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?