Jewett v. Prison Health Services
Filing
51
ORDER signed by District Judge Otis D. Wright, II on 7/8/2011 DENYING as MOOT plaintiff's 50 Second Motion for Appointment of Counsel. (Marciel, M)
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
9
FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
EVERETT JOSEPH JEWETT,
)
)
Plaintiff,
)
)
vs.
)
)
)
PRISON HEALTH SERVICES, INC.
)
)
Defendant.
)
___________________________________ )
No. 2:06-CV-02857 ODW
ORDER
18
On January11, 2011 the court, in response to Plaintiff’s second request for the appointment
19
of counsel to act on his behalf, ordered that he provide the court with his current address by
20
February 7, 2011. It was expressly stipulated that failure to so advise the court would result in the
21
dismissal of this action.
22
No change of address was lodged with the court on or before February 7, 2011 and on March
23
29, 2011 the court ordered this matter dismissed for plaintiff’s failure to keep the court advised of
24
his current address.
25
On July 5, 2011 Plaintiff filed his objection to the dismissal on the ground that while on
26
parole, his address is the parole office, which apparently will assume the responsibility of
27
forwarding his mail. The court offers no opinion on whether or not that is correct. For the court’s
28
1
purposes, the inquiry is really quite simple. Litigants, whether or not in custody, are required to
2
keep the court apprised of their mailing address. Plaintiff was ordered to do so by a date certain and
3
failed to do so. Plaintiff’s objection is overruled and the matter has been and remains dismissed.
4
The second motion for appointment of counsel is DENIED as MOOT.
5
6
7
DATED: July 8, 2011
______________________________
OTIS D. WRIGHT, II, DISTRICT JUDGE
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
2
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?