Jewett v. Prison Health Services
Filing
54
ORDER signed by District Judge Otis D. Wright, II on 7/25/11 ORDERING that Plaintiff's MOTIONS 49 53 are DENIED. Plaintiff is cautioned that this file is CLOSED. No other documents are to be filed under this case number and this will be the court's last order issued in this case. (Mena-Sanchez, L)
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
9
FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
EVERETT JOSEPH JEWETT,
)
)
Plaintiff,
)
)
vs.
)
)
)
PRISON HEALTH SERVICES, INC.
)
)
Defendant.
)
_______________________________ )
No. 2:06-CV-02857 ODW
ORDER
18
Plaintiff has recently filed two motions on a closed case. On July 6, 2011 he filed
19
a motion to re-open this case [49] and on July 22 he filed a motion to re-file his complaint.
20
[53] In the latter motion, he makes several requests for the appointment of counsel. On
21
more than one occasion, the court has advised Plaintiff that there are no provisions in the
22
law for the appointment of counsel to represent an indigent party pursing a civil action.
23
Once again, and hopefully for the final time, the request is DENIED.
24
On March 29, 2011 the court ordered this matter dismissed due to plaintiff’s failure
25
to keep the court advised of his current residence. It is curious that plaintiff does not seek
26
to justify his failure or refusal to obey the court’s order regarding keeping the court advised
27
of his current address. He merely seeks to nullify the order without offering an explanation
28
1
for his non-compliance in the first instance. A motion for reconsideration, if indeed that is
2
how the court is to construe these recent filings, must demonstrate some reason why the
3
court should reconsider its decision. Medford Pacific v. Danmor Construction, Inc., 2
4
F.Supp.2d 1322, 1323 (D.Or.1998). Plaintiff has offered no such rationale, therefore the
5
request to “re-open the case” is denied.
6
As for plaintiff’s request to “re-file” his complaint, he does not need the court’s
7
permission to file a pleading or initiate an action to redress grievances . If he wishes to file
8
a complaint, then he may do so. However, a complaint is not “refiled.” The original action,
9
06-02857 ODW has been dismissed. It will not be re-opened nor will the dismissal be set
10
aside. If plaintiff is desirous of initiating a new action then he is free to do so. The new
11
complaint, however, must be a stand-alone pleading. It must not rely on or incorporate by
12
reference any other pleading. It will have an entirely new case number, and of course, it
13
must only allege claims that remain viable under the applicable statutes of limitation. The
14
First Amended Prisoner Civil Rights Complaint [52] is not legally sufficient and has been
15
filed in a closed case. It is of no legal consequence.
16
17
18
Lastly, Plaintiff is cautioned that this file is CLOSED. No other documents are to be
filed under this case number and this will be the court’s last order issued in this case.
19
20
21
22
DATED: July 25, 2011
______________________________
OTIS D. WRIGHT, II, DISTRICT JUDGE
23
24
25
26
27
28
2
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?