Mendoza v. Sisto et al

Filing 3

ORDER of INTRADISTRICT TRANSFER from Sacramento (2:07cv71 GEB DAD) to Fresno (1:07cv94 OWW SMS) signed by Judge Dale A. Drozd on 1/16/2007. (Matson, R)

Download PDF
(HC) Mendoza v. Sisto et al Doc. 3 Case 2:07-cv-00071-GEB-DAD Document 3 Filed 01/17/2007 Page 1 of 2 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 vs. D.K. SISTO, Warden, et al., Respondents. / Petitioner, a state prisoner proceeding pro se, has filed an application for a writ of habeas corpus pursuant to 28 U.S.C. 2254. Petitioner has not paid the required filing fee or submitted an application to proceed in forma pauperis. In his habeas petition, petitioner challenges a judgment of conviction entered by the Stanislaus County Superior Court on July 7, 2003. Stanislaus County is part of the Fresno Division of the United States District Court for the Eastern District of California. See Local Rule 3-120(d). A civil action that has not been commenced in the proper division of this court may, on the court's own motion, be transferred to the proper division of the court. See Local Rule 3120(f). Therefore, this action will be transferred to the Fresno Division of the court. ///// ///// 1 Dockets.Justia.com IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA MOISES MENDOZA, Petitioner, No. CIV S-07-0071 GEB DAD P ORDER Case 2:07-cv-00071-GEB-DAD Document 3 Filed 01/17/2007 Page 2 of 2 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 DAD:13:mp mend0071.109 Good cause appearing, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that: 1. This action is transferred to the United States District Court for the Eastern District of California sitting in Fresno; and 2. All future filings shall reference the new Fresno case number assigned and shall be filed at: United States District Court Eastern District of California 2500 Tulare Street Fresno, CA 93721 DATED: January 16, 2007. 2

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?