Sanders v. State of California et al
ORDER signed by Judge Dale A. Drozd on 1/31/07: Petitioner shall submit, within thirty days after this order is filed anapplication to proceed IFP. The Clerk is directed to send petitioner a copy IFP. (Kaminski, H)
(HC) Sanders v. State of California et al
Page 1 of 2
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 vs. STATE OF CALIFORNIA, et al., Respondents. / Petitioner, a state prisoner proceeding pro se, has filed a petition for writ of habeas corpus pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 2254. Although petitioner states in her request for appointment of counsel that she is indigent, she has not filed an application to proceed in forma pauperis. See 28 U.S.C. §§ 1914(a) & 1915(a). Petitioner will be granted thirty days to file an application to proceed in forma pauperis. After petitioner submits a properly completed application to proceed in forma pauperis, the court will entertain petitioner's request for appointment of counsel and her motion to hold these proceedings in abeyance pending disposition of a state habeas petition filed in the California Supreme Court on December 15, 2006. ///// ///// 1
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA TRINA RENEE SANDERS, Petitioner, No. CIV S-07-0154 DFL DAD P
Page 2 of 2
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26
Accordingly, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that: 1. Petitioner shall submit, within thirty days after this order is filed, an application to proceed in forma pauperis; any request for extension of time to comply with this order should be filed before the thirty-day period expires; petitioner is cautioned that failure to comply with court orders may result in sanctions or a recommendation that this action be dismissed. 2. The Clerk of the Court is directed to send petitioner a copy of the in forma pauperis form used by this district in habeas corpus proceedings. DATED: January 31, 2007.
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?