Gipbsin v. Deforest, Goni, Prater, Shelton and Stone

Filing 152

ORDER signed by Magistrate Judge Edmund F. Brennan on 11/04/09 ordering plaintiff's 10/28/09 and 11/02/09 requests for production of documents and requests for admissions 149 , 150 , 151 are stricken and the clerk of the court shall make a notation on the docket to that effect. (Plummer, M)

Download PDF
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 vs. SCOTT KERNAN, et al., Defendants. / Plaintiff is a state prisoner proceeding without counsel in an action brought under 42 U.S.C. § 1983. On October 28, 2009, plaintiff filed a request for production of documents and request for admissions. On November 2, 2009, plaintiff filed additional requests for production of documents and requests for admissions. The court has repeatedly warned plaintiff that interrogatories, requests for production, requests for admission, responses and proofs of service thereof "shall not be filed with the clerk until there is a proceeding in which the document or proof of service is at issue. When required in a proceeding, only that part of the request and response that is in issue shall be filed." Local Rules 33-250(c), 34-250(c) & 36-250(c). See also Nov. 24, 2008 Order; June 10, 2009 Order. Plaintiff's continued failure to comply with the court's orders will result in a recommendation that this action be dismissed pursuant to Fed. R. Civ. P. 41(b). 1 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA CLARENCE A. GIPBSIN, Plaintiff, No. CIV S-07-0157 MCE EFB P ORDER 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 Plaintiff's October 28, 2009 and November 2, 2009 requests for production of documents and requests for admissions are stricken and the Clerk of the Court shall make a notation on the docket to that effect. So ordered. DATED: November 4, 2009. 2

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?