Sherman v. Dynes et al

Filing 3

ORDER signed by Judge Craig M. Kellison on 2/13/07 ORDERING that: pltf shall submit, w/in 30 days, an affidavit is support of his request to proceed IFP; and the Clerk is DIRECTED to send pltf a new Application to Proceed IFP. (Brown, T)

Download PDF
(PC)Sherman v. Dynes et al Doc. 3 Case 2:07-cv-00228-GEB-CMK Document 3 Filed 02/14/2007 Page 1 of 2 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 vs. ROBERT DYNES, et al., Defendants. / Plaintiff, a Yolo County prisoner proceeding pro se, has filed a civil rights action pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 1983. Plaintiff has not, however, filed an in forma pauperis affidavit or paid the required filing fee. See 28 U.S.C. §§ 1914(a), 1915(a). Plaintiff will be provided the opportunity either to submit the appropriate affidavit in support of a request to proceed in forma pauperis or to submit the appropriate filing fee. In accordance with the above, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that: 1. Plaintiff shall submit, within thirty days from the date of this order, an affidavit in support of his request to proceed in forma pauperis on the form provided by the Clerk of Court, or the appropriate filing fee; plaintiff's failure to comply with this order will result in the dismissal of this action; and ///// 1 Dockets.Justia.com IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA JOE SHERMAN, Plaintiff, No. CIV S-07-0228 GEB CMK P ORDER Case 2:07-cv-00228-GEB-CMK Document 3 Filed 02/14/2007 Page 2 of 2 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 /m p 2. The Clerk of the Court is directed to send plaintiff a new Application to Proceed In Forma Pauperis By a Prisoner. DATED: February 13, 2007. ______________________________________ CRAIG M. KELLISON UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE s h e r 07cv0228.3a 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 2

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?