Susanville Indian Rancheria v. Leavitt et al
Filing
22
STIPULATION and ORDER signed by Judge Garland E. Burrell Jr. on 2/20/07 ORDERING the briefing schedule for cross motions for summary judgment set forth in the Court's 2/14/07 Order is AMENDED as follows: Cross motions filed by 3/20/07; oppositions filed by 4/2/07; replies filed by 4/10/07; and the hearing is re-set for 4/30/2007 at 09:00 AM in Courtroom 10 (GEB) before Judge Garland E. Burrell Jr..(Carlos, K)
Susanville Indian Rancheria v. Leavitt et al
Doc. 22
Case 2:07-cv-00259-GEB-DAD
Document 22
Filed 02/21/2007
Page 1 of 2
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28
McGREGOR W. SCOTT United States Attorney JOHN F. GISLA, SB #42829 Assistant U.S. Attorney 501 I Street, Suite 10-100 Sacramento, California 95814 Telephone: (916) 554-2740 Attorneys for the United States
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
SUSANVILLE INDIAN RANCHERIA, Plaintiff, v. MIKE LEAVITT, et al., Defendants.
No.2:07-cv-259-GEB STIPULATION RE BRIEFING SCHEDULE FOR CROSS MOTIONS FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT; ORDER
It is stipulated between the parties that the briefing schedule for cross motions for summary judgment set forth in the Court's February 14, 2007 Order be amended as follows: March 20, 2007 April 2, 2007 April 10, 2007 April 30, 2007, 9:00 a.m. DATED: February 20, 2007 Cross motions are filed Oppositions are filed Replies are filed Hearing McGREGOR W. SCOTT United States Attorney
By:
/s/ John F. Gisla JOHN F. GISLA Assistant United States Attorney Attorneys for the United States 1
Dockets.Justia.com
Case 2:07-cv-00259-GEB-DAD
Document 22
Filed 02/21/2007
Page 2 of 2
1 2 3 4 5 6
DATED: February 20, 2007
HOBBS,STRAUS, DEAN & WALKER, LLP
By:
/s/ Geoffrey D. Strommer GEOFFREY D. STROMMER Attorneys for Plaintiff
IT IS SO ORDERED. 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 2 GARLAND E. BURRELL, JR. United States District Judge Dated: February 20, 2007
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?