Rider v. Subia et al

Filing 3

ORDER signed by Judge Gregory G. Hollows on 3/7/07 ORDERING that the petitioner shall submit, within 30 days from the date of this order, an affidavit in support of his request to proceed IFP or the appropriate filing fee. The clerk is directed to send peititoner a copy of the IFP form used in this district. (Donati, J)

Download PDF
(HC) Rider v. Subia et al Doc. 3 Case 2:07-cv-00329-RRB-GGH Document 3 Filed 03/07/2007 Page 1 of 2 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 vs. R. SUBIA, Warden, et al., Respondents. / Petitioner, a state prisoner proceeding pro se, has filed an application for a writ of habeas corpus pursuant to 28 U.S.C. 2254. Petitioner has not, however, filed an in forma pauperis affidavit or paid the required filing fee ($5.00). See 28 U.S.C. 1914(a); 1915(a). Petitioner will be provided the opportunity to either submit the appropriate affidavit in support of a request to proceed in forma pauperis or submit the appropriate filing fee. In accordance with the above, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that: 1. Petitioner shall submit, within thirty days from the date of this order, an affidavit in support of his request to proceed in forma pauperis or the appropriate filing fee; petitioner's failure to comply with this order will result in the dismissal of this action; and ///// ///// 1 Dockets.Justia.com IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA LARRY RIDER, Petitioner, No. CIV S-07-0329 DFL GGH P ORDER Case 2:07-cv-00329-RRB-GGH Document 3 Filed 03/07/2007 Page 2 of 2 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 GGH:bb ride0329.101a 2. The Clerk of the Court is directed to send petitioner a copy of the in forma pauperis form used by this district. DATED: 3/7/07 /s/ Gregory G. Hollows GREGORY G. HOLLOWS UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE 2

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?