Muhammad v. Director Of Corrections et al

Filing 99

ORDER signed by Judge Garland E. Burrell, Jr on 9/8/2010 ORDERING that the 89 findings and recommendations filed August 6, 2010, are adopted in full and Defendants' October 2, 2009 89 motion for summary judgment is GRANTED. CASE CLOSED. (Duong, D)

Download PDF
(PC) Muhammad v. Director Of Corrections et al Doc. 99 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 vs. DIRECTOR OF CORRECTIONS, et al., Defendants. / Plaintiff, a state prisoner proceeding pro se, has filed this civil rights action seeking relief under 42 U.S.C. 1983. The matter was referred to a United States Magistrate Judge pursuant to 28 U.S.C. 636(b)(1)(B) and Local Rule 302. On August 6, 2010, the magistrate judge filed findings and recommendations herein which were served on all parties and which contained notice to all parties that any objections to the findings and recommendations were to be filed within fourteen days. Plaintiff has filed objections to the findings and recommendations. In accordance with the provisions of 28 U.S.C. 636(b)(1)(C) and Local Rule 304, this court has conducted a de novo review of this case. Having carefully reviewed the entire file, the court finds the findings and recommendations to be supported by the record and by proper analysis. 1 Dockets.Justia.com IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA SHAKA MUHAMMAD, Plaintiff, No. CIV S-07-0375 GEB GGH P ORDER 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 granted. and Accordingly, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that: 1. The findings and recommendations filed August 6, 2010, are adopted in full; 2. Defendants' October 2, 2009 motion for summary judgment (Docket No. 89) is Dated: September 8, 2010 GARLAND E. BURRELL, JR. United States District Judge 2

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?