Coldani v. Hamm et al.,

Filing 65

ORDER signed by Judge John A. Mendez on 9/18/09 ORDERING that upon reconsideration, 50 Order of the magistrate judge is AFFIRMED. Therefore, pursuant to the 64 magistrate judge's order, defendants shall pay the sanction award set forth therein within 20 days of the date of this order.(Donati, J)

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 On September 9, 2008, defendants filed a request for reconsideration of the magistrate judge's order filed August 26, 2008, granting plaintiff's motions to compel and denying defendants' motion for protective order. Pursuant to E.D. Local Rule 72-303(f), a magistrate judge's orders shall be upheld unless "clearly erroneous or contrary to law." Upon review of the entire file, the court finds that it does not appear that the magistrate judge's ruling was clearly erroneous or contrary to law. //// //// //// //// 1 vs. JACK HAMM and PATRICIA HAMM, individually and doing business as LIMA RANCH/DAIRY, Defendants. / ORDER IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA RAYMOND COLDANI, Plaintiff, No. CIV S-07-0660 JAM EFB

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26

Therefore, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that, upon reconsideration, the August 26, 2008, order of the magistrate judge is affirmed. Therefore, pursuant to the magistrate judge's September 17, 2009, order, defendants shall pay the sanction award set forth therein within twenty days of the date of this order. DATED: September 18, 2009 /s/ John A. Mendez UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

2