Todd v. Solano et al

Filing 36

ORDER RE: SETTLEMENT AND DISPOSITION signed by Judge Frank C. Damrell, Jr. on 9/4/09 ORDERING that pursuant to the representation of the parties, in the above action, the court has determined that this case has settled. In accordance with the provis ions of Local Rule 16-160, dispositional documents are to be filed on or before October 9, 2009. All dates/hearings set in this matter, to include any pending motions, are hereby VACATED. FAILURE TO COMPLY WITH THIS ORDER MAY BE GROUNDS FOR THE IMPOSITION OF SANCTIONS ON ANY AND ALL COUNSEL AS WELL AS ANY PARTY OR PARTIES WHO CAUSE NON-COMPLIANCE WITH THIS ORDER. (Becknal, R)

Download PDF
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 _______________________________________ FRANK C. DAMRELL, JR. UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA MICHAEL TODD, et. al., Plaintiff, v. COUNTY OF SOLANO, et. al., Defendants. __________________________________/ Pursuant to the representation of the parties, in the above action, the court has determined that this case has settled. In accordance with the provisions of Local Rule 16-160, dispositional documents are to be filed on or before October 9, 2009. All dates/hearings set in this matter, to include any pending motions, are hereby VACATED. FAILURE TO COMPLY WITH THIS ORDER MAY BE GROUNDS FOR THE IMPOSITION OF SANCTIONS ON ANY AND ALL COUNSEL AS WELL AS ANY PARTY OR PARTIES WHO CAUSE NON-COMPLIANCE WITH THIS ORDER. IT IS SO ORDERED. Dated: September 4, 2009 NO. 2:07-cv-0726 FCD EFB ORDER RE: SETTLEMENT AND DISPOSITION

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?