Miller v. City of Sacramento et al
Filing
63
ORDER signed by Magistrate Judge Carolyn K. Delaney on 8/25/11 GRANTING 62 Motion for Extension of Time to file an opposition to 48 Motion for Summary Judgment; opposition due no later than 9/28/11; Motion for Summary Judgment Hearing CONTINUED to 10/19/2011 at 10:00 AM in Courtroom 26 (CKD) before Magistrate Judge Carolyn K. Delaney. (Manzer, C)
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
8
FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
9
KEVIN MILLER,
10
Plaintiff,
11
12
No. CIV S-07-765 FCD CKD PS
vs.
CITY OF SACRAMENTO, et al.,
13
Defendants.
14
ORDER
/
15
By order filed July 15, 2011, hearing on defendants’ motion for summary
16
judgment was continued due to plaintiff’s failure to file opposition. The July 15, 2011 order
17
directed plaintiff to file opposition no later than August 25, 2011. Plaintiff has now requested an
18
additional extension of time in which to file opposition. Good cause appearing, IT IS HEREBY
19
ORDERED that:
20
1. Plaintiff’s request for extension of time (dkt. no. 62) is granted. Plaintiff shall
21
file opposition to defendants’ motion for summary judgment no later than September 28, 2011.
22
Reply, if any, shall be filed no later than October 5, 2011.
23
/////
24
/////
25
/////
26
/////
1
1
2
2. The September 14, 2011 hearing on defendants’ motion is vacated. Hearing on
the motion is continued to October 19, 2011 at 10:00 a.m. in courtroom no. 26.
3
Dated: August 25, 2011
4
_____________________________________
CAROLYN K. DELANEY
UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE
5
6
7
4
8
miller-sacto.eot
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
2
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?