Rios v. Tilton, et. al.
Filing
168
STIPULATION and PROTECTIVE ORDER signed by Magistrate Judge Kendall J. Newman on 9/15/2014 APPROVING the parties stipulation to the provisions of this protective order that apply to the confidential materials as described in this order. The provisions of this order shall remain in force and effect until further order of this Court. (See Order for Details)(Yin, K)
1
2
3
4
5
TODD M. NOONAN (SBN 172962)
JOHN WHITTAKER (SBN 251791)
ASHLEY H. JOYCE (SBN 272549)
MEGAN A. SAMMUT (SBN 287772)
DLA PIPER LLP (US)
400 Capitol Mall, Suite 2400
Sacramento, CA 95814
Telephone:
916.930-3200
Facsimile:
916.930-3201
john.whittaker@dlapiper.com
6
7
Attorneys for Plaintiff
RENO FUENTES RIOS
8
9
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
10
EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
11
12
RENO FUENTES RIOS,
13
14
15
CASE NO. 2:07-cv-00790 KJN P
Plaintiff,
[PROPOSED] STIPULATED
PROTECTIVE ORDER
v.
J.E. TILTON, et al.,
16
Defendants.
17
18
Subject to the approval of the Court, and pursuant to the Court’s September 3, 2014
19
Pretrial Order providing that the parties submit a stipulated protective order to provide for the
20
submission of certain confidential source information to the Court in camera and to Plaintiff’s
21
counsel, the undersigned parties through their counsel of record stipulate that the provisions of
22
this Protective Order shall apply to the confidential materials described below.
23
1.
This Order covers the following materials:
(a)
24
The five confidential source items and all supporting confidential
25
information upon which CDCR employees relied in validating Plaintiff as a prison gang
26
associate, which have been ordered to be submitted to the Court in camera, and which have not
27
been previously produced to Plaintiff;
28
-1-
DLA P IPER LLP (US)
SACRA M E NT O
WEST\249992534.3
[PROPOSED] STIPULATED PROTECTIVE ORDER; NO. 2:07-CV-00790 KJN
1
2
(b)
All declaration(s) that might be submitted by Defendants in connection
with the in camera review specified in item (a);
3
(c)
All deposition testimony or oral argument regarding items (a) or (b);
4
(d)
All motions, exhibits and attachments thereto, and hearings regarding items
5
(a) or (b), including, but not limited to, any in camera review of items (a) or (b) and any briefing
6
submitted by either party in connection with any in camera review of items (a) or (b); and
7
(e)
All court testimony regarding items (a) or (b).
8
Defendants assert that these materials have been deemed confidential by the California
9
Department of Corrections (“CDCR”) for safety and security reasons and have been restricted
10
11
from general distribution, including, but not limited to, inmates, parolees, and the public.
2.
All documents and information falling within one or more of the categories
12
enumerated in Paragraph 1 shall be designated as “Confidential -- Attorneys Eyes Only” and
13
subject to this Protective Order. Such material is referred to herein as “Confidential Material.”
14
All documents containing Confidential Material shall be marked “Confidential – Attorneys’ Eyes
15
Only” on each page, and marked in such a fashion so as not to obscure any of the underlying
16
content of the document(s). Any failure to mark appropriate documents containing Confidential
17
Material as “Confidential – Attorneys’ Eyes Only” shall not operate as a waiver of the protections
18
provided under this Protective Order. In such event, after the failure is discovered, the party
19
discovering the failure shall promptly notify the other party of such failure, and the producing
20
party shall take all necessary steps to ensure that the Confidential Material is correctly marked as
21
“Confidential – Attorneys’ Eyes Only.”
22
3.
23
24
Confidential Material may be disclosed only to the following persons:
(a)
The Court, and court personnel and court reporters employed by the Court
who are involved in proceedings in this action;
25
(b)
Counsel for Plaintiff;
26
(c)
Paralegal, clerical, and secretarial personnel regularly employed by counsel
27
for Plaintiff and designated by counsel for Plaintiff to review or handle such materials; and
28
-2-
DLA P IPER LLP (US)
SACRA M E NT O
WEST\249992534.3
[PROPOSED] STIPULATED PROTECTIVE ORDER; NO. 2:07-CV-00790 KJN
1
2
3
(d)
Any other person as to whom Plaintiff’s counsel and Defendants in writing
agree.
4.
This Stipulated Protective Order is intended to, and does preclude, counsel for
4
Plaintiff and the individuals mentioned in Paragraph 3, subsections (a)-(d) from disclosing
5
Confidential Material to Plaintiff, members of Plaintiff’s family, friends or associates of Plaintiff,
6
any inmate or parolee, or to the public.
7
5.
Each person listed in Paragraph 3 subsections (c) and (d) to whom disclosure of
8
Confidential Material is made shall, prior to the time of disclosure, be provided with a copy of the
9
Stipulated Protective Order and execute a non-disclosure agreement. (See attached Non-
10
Disclosure Agreement (“NDA”)). As provided in the NDA, such persons must consent to be
11
subject to the jurisdiction of the United States District Court for the Eastern District of California
12
with respect to any proceeding relating to the enforcement of this Stipulated Protective Order.
13
They must additionally agree to maintain Confidential Material, including copies, notes, or other
14
transcriptions made from the Confidential Material, in a secure manner to prevent unauthorized
15
access. Finally, they must agree to return the Confidential Material, including copies, notes, or
16
other transcriptions made from the materials, to counsel for Plaintiff within thirty days after
17
conclusion of this action. Executed non-disclosure agreements shall be retained by counsel for
18
Plaintiff and made available for inspection by Defendants’ counsel upon order of the Court.
19
6.
If counsel for Plaintiff wishes to disclose Confidential Material to any person not
20
enumerated above in Paragraph 3, subsections (a)–(d), including, but not limited to Plaintiff,
21
counsel for Plaintiff must first submit a separate application for limited disclosure to the Court
22
under seal, and serve same to Defendants’ counsel. The disclosure of Confidential Material to
23
any person not enumerated in Paragraph 3 subsections (a)–(d), shall be withheld unless and until
24
ordered by the Court upon a finding of good cause.
25
7.
No person who has been afforded access to Confidential Material under this
26
Protective Order shall disclose or discuss the Confidential Material except as is necessary for the
27
prosecution, defense, or settlement of this litigation, and then only in accordance with Paragraph
28
3 of this Order.
-3-
DLA P IPER LLP (US)
SACRA M E NT O
WEST\249992534.3
[PROPOSED] STIPULATED PROTECTIVE ORDER; NO. 2:07-CV-00790 KJN
1
8.
If counsel for Plaintiff seeks to depose, interview, or otherwise contact any
2
confidential informant or other inmate or parolee whose name appears on any Confidential
3
Material, and whom Plaintiff’s counsel first discovered through such Confidential Material, then
4
Plaintiff’s counsel must secure the written agreement of Defendants’ counsel or further order
5
from the Court.
6
9.
Counsel for Plaintiff and persons listed in Paragraph 3, subsection (c), shall not
7
make copies of the Confidential Material obtained by them, except as is necessary for the purpose
8
of this litigation. Counsel for Plaintiff will maintain control over all Confidential Material and
9
copies obtained by them.
10
10.
Unless counsel otherwise agreed in writing, when Confidential Material is
11
included in any papers to be filed in Court, the party seeking to file such papers shall file a
12
Motion to File Under Seal in accordance with and to the extent allowable by the Eastern District
13
of California Local Rules, and lodge such papers with the Clerk as required under the Eastern
14
District of California Local Rules.
15
16
17
11.
All Confidential Material obtained by counsel for Plaintiff shall be used solely in
connection with this litigation and not for any other purpose.
12.
No later than thirty days after the conclusion of the trial and any appeal, or upon
18
other termination of this litigation, all originals of items (a) and (b) of Paragraph 1 obtained by
19
counsel for Plaintiff shall be either destroyed or returned to counsel for Defendants, at the
20
direction of Defendants’ counsel. All other Confidential Materials in the possession of counsel
21
for Plaintiff shall be destroyed.
22
13.
The limitations on access to Confidential Material contained in the foregoing
23
provisions of this order do not apply to Defendants, their counsel, employees, or representatives.
24
Nothing in the protective order is intended to prevent officials or employees of the State of
25
California or authorized governmental officials from having ordinary and usual access to
26
Confidential Material to which they could have access in the normal course of their official
27
duties. Neither the filing with the Court of motions, exhibits, or attachments containing personal
28
or otherwise confidential information about any individual Defendant nor the service on
-4-
DLA P IPER LLP (US)
SACRA M E NT O
WEST\249992534.3
[PROPOSED] STIPULATED PROTECTIVE ORDER; NO. 2:07-CV-00790 KJN
1
Defendants’ counsel of such motions, exhibits, or attachments, shall be deemed to constitute
2
disclosing Confidential Material to any individual Defendant in violation of the terms of this
3
stipulated protective order.
4
14.
The provisions of this protective order are without prejudice to the right of any
5
party to apply to the Court for a further protective order relating to any Confidential Material in
6
the litigation, or to apply to the Court for a modification of this order or for any order permitting
7
disclosure of Confidential Material beyond the terms of this order.
8
15.
9
this Court.
10
16.
The provisions of this order shall remain in force and effect until further order of
Should Plaintiff’s counsel, or any individual mentioned in Paragraph 3 of this
11
Order, fail to comply with any provisions of this Protective Order, the Court may, in its
12
discretion, impose sanctions on the appropriate party including, but not limited to, those
13
applicable as listed in Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 37(b)(2).
14
15
SO STIPULATED.
16
Dated: September 10, 2014
DLA PIPER LLP (US)
17
18
By:
/s/ John S. Whittaker
JOHN S. WHITTAKER
Attorneys for Plaintiff
By:
/s/ David A. Carrasco (authorized on 9/10/14)
DAVID A. CARRASCO
Deputy Attorney General
Office of the California Attorney General
Attorney for Defendants
19
20
21
Dated: September 10, 2014
22
23
24
25
APPROVED AND SO ORDERED.
Dated: September 15, 2014
26
27
28
-5-
DLA P IPER LLP (US)
SACRA M E NT O
WEST\249992534.3
[PROPOSED] STIPULATED PROTECTIVE ORDER; NO. 2:07-CV-00790 KJN
1
NON – DISCLOSURE AGREEMENT
2
Rios v. Tilton, et al., Case No. 2:07-cv-00790
3
4
I,
(print name)
5
6
, hereby certify my understanding that
Confidential Material is being provided to me pursuant to the terms and restrictions of the
7
Protective Order dated
, Rios v. Tilton, et al., case number 2:07-cv-
8
00790. I have been given a copy of the Protective Order and have read it. I agree to be bound by
9
the Protective Order and will not reveal the Confidential Material to anyone, except as allowed by
10
the Order. I will maintain all such Confidential Material that is provided to me, including copies,
11
notes, or other transcriptions made from the materials, in a secure manner to prevent unauthorized
12
access to it. No later than thirty days after the conclusion of this action, I will return the
13
Confidential Material, including copies, notes, or other transcriptions made from the materials, to
14
counsel for Plaintiff. I hereby consent to the jurisdiction of the United States District Court of the
15
Eastern District of California for the purpose of enforcing the Protecting Order.
16
17
DATED:
Signature
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
-6-
DLA P IPER LLP (US)
SACRA M E NT O
WEST\249992534.3
[PROPOSED] STIPULATED PROTECTIVE ORDER; NO. 2:07-CV-00790 KJN
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?