Ramos v. Sisto et al
Filing
17
ORDER signed by Magistrate Judge Craig M. Kellison on 7/14/10 ORDERING petitioner to SHOW CAUSE in writing w/in 30 days why this petition should not be dismissed as moot; respondents may file a response w/in 15 days after service of petitioner's brief; petitioner's reply due w/in 10 days after respondent's response. (Yin, K)
<![CDATA[
(HC) Ramos v. Sisto et al
Doc. 17
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 vs. D.K. SISTO, et al., Respondents. / Petitioner, a state prisoner proceeding with appointed counsel, brings this petition for a writ of habeas corpus pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 2254 challenging the denial of parole. Respondent has filed a notice with the court that Petitioner has been granted parole and released from custody. It appears, therefore, that this action is now moot in that there is no relief on Petitioner's petition which the court can grant. Accordingly, Petitioner shall show cause in writing within 30 days of the date of this order why this petition should not be dismissed as moot given Petitioner's release from custody on parole. Respondents may file a response within 15 /// /// 1
Dockets.Justia.com
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
AVELINO RAMOS, Petitioner,
No. CIV S-07-0868-JAM-CMK-P
ORDER
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26
days after service of petitioner's brief. Petitioner may file a reply within 10 days after service of any response by Respondents. IT IS SO ORDERED.
DATED: July 14, 2010 ______________________________________ CRAIG M. KELLISON UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE
2
]]>
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?
