Hollis v. Wong

Filing 6

FINDINGS and RECOMMENDATIONS signed by Judge Dale A. Drozd on 5/18/07 RECOMMENDING that this action be dismissed due to pltf's failure to keep the court apprised of his current address. Case referred to Judge Levi. Within 20 days after being served with these findings, pltf may file written objections with the court. (Kastilahn, A)

(PC) Hollis v. Wong

Doc. 6

Case 2:07-cv-00872-ALA

Document 6

Filed 05/22/2007

Page 1 of 2

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 vs. J.A. WONG, Defendant. / A recent court order was served on plaintiff's address of record and returned by the postal service. It appears that plaintiff has failed to comply with Local Rule 83-182(f), which requires that a party appearing in propria persona inform the court of any address change. Accordingly, IT IS HEREBY RECOMMENDED that this action be dismissed due to plaintiff's failure to keep the court apprised of his current address. See Local Rules 83182(f) and 11-110. These findings and recommendations are submitted to the United States District Judge assigned to the case, pursuant to the provisions of 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(l). Within twenty days after being served with these findings and recommendations, plaintiff may file written objections with the court. The document should be captioned "Objections to Magistrate Judge's Findings and Recommendations." Plaintiff is advised that failure to file objections within the 1
Dockets.Justia.com

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA VERNON SYID HOLLIS, Plaintiff, No. CIV S-07-0872 DFL DAD P

FINDINGS & RECOMMENDATIONS

Case 2:07-cv-00872-ALA

Document 6

Filed 05/22/2007

Page 2 of 2

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26

specified time may waive the right to appeal the District Court's order. Martinez v. Ylst, 951 F.2d 1153 (9th Cir. 1991). DATED: May 18, 2007.

DAD/bb holl0872.33a

2