Sims v. Veal et al

Filing 118

ORDER signed by Magistrate Judge Edmund F. Brennan on 02/28/12 ordering that within 21 days of the date of this order, plaintiff shall submit a confidential settlement statement as ordered on 01/31/12 and show cause as to why this action should not be dismissed pursuant to FRCP 41(b) for his failure to prosecute and to comply with the court's 01/31/12 order. (Plummer, M)

Download PDF
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 9 FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 STANLEY SIMS, Plaintiff, 12 13 14 15 No. CIV S-07-0898 KJM EFB P Defendants. 11 ORDER vs. VEAL, et al., / 16 Plaintiff is a former state prisoner without counsel in this action filed pursuant to 42 17 U.S.C. § 1983. In his pretrial statement, plaintiff indicated that a settlement conference would be 18 helpful in resolving this matter. Dckt. No. 114 at 23. On January 31, 2012, the court ordered the 19 parties to submit confidential settlement statements within 21 days. Dckt. No. 117. Plaintiff has 20 not submitted a confidential settlement statement or otherwise responded to the court’s order. 21 A party’s failure to comply with a court order “may be grounds for imposition by the 22 Court of any and all sanctions authorized by statute or Rule or within the inherent power of the 23 Court.” E.D. Cal. Local Rule 110. The court may recommend that an action be dismissed with 24 or without prejudice, as appropriate, if a party disobeys an order. See Ferdik v. Bonzelet, 963 25 F.2d 1258, 1263 (9th Cir. 1992) (district court did not abuse discretion in dismissing pro se 26 plaintiff’s complaint for failing to obey an order to re-file an amended complaint to comply with 1 1 Federal Rules of Civil Procedure); Carey v. King, 856 F.2d 1439, 1440-41 (9th Cir. 1988) 2 (dismissal for pro se plaintiff’s failure to comply with local rule regarding notice of change of 3 address affirmed); see also Fed. R. Civ. P. 41(b); Hells Canyon Pres. Council v. U.S. Forest 4 Serv., 403 F.3d 683, 689 (9th Cir. 2005) (recognizing that courts may dismiss an action pursuant 5 to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 41(b) sua sponte for a plaintiff’s failure to prosecute or 6 comply with the rules of civil procedure or the court’s orders). 7 Accordingly, it is hereby ORDERED that: 8 1. Within 21 days of the date of this order, plaintiff shall submit a confidential settlement 9 statement as ordered on January 31, 2012, and show cause as to why this action should not be 10 dismissed pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 41(b) for his failure to prosecute and to 11 comply with the court’s January 31, 2012 order. 12 2. Failure to comply with this order will result in a recommendation that this action be 13 dismissed pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 41(b). 14 DATED: February 28, 2012. 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 2

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?