Protopappas v. Kramer
Filing
24
ORDER signed by Chief Judge Robert S. Lasnik on 10/22/09 ORDERING that Certificate of Appealability is not required; clerk shall process appeal accordingly. (Owen, K)
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26
ORDER REGARDING CERTIFICATE OF APPEALABILITY
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA _______________________________________ ) TONY PROTOPAPPAS, ) ) Petitioner, ) v. ) ) M. KRAMER, ) ) Respondent. ) _______________________________________)
Case No. C07-0901RSL-JLW ORDER REGARDING CERTIFICATE OF APPEALABILITY
This matter comes before the Court on petitioner's notice of appeal. Dkt. # 23. The Clerk of Court entered a notation in the docket that "CERTIFICATE OF APPEALABILITY REQUIRED for processing to USCA . . . ." Because petitioner challenges the detention decision of an administrative body (the Board of Parole Hearings), a certificate of appealability is not necessary. Rosas v. Nielsen, 428 F.3d 1229, 1231-32 (9th Cir. 2005). The Clerk of Court shall process Mr. Protopappas' appeal accordingly. Dated this 22nd day of October, 2009.
A
Robert S. Lasnik United States District Judge
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?