Kirch v. Clay
Filing
15
ORDER ADOPTING FINDINGS and RECOMMENDATIONS IN FULL 13 signed by Judge Morrison C. England, Jr on 2/1/08: Defendant's motion to dismiss 10 is granted. The Clerk is directed to enter judgment and close this file. CASE CLOSED.(Kaminski, H)
(HC) Kirch v. Clay
Doc. 15
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 vs. I.D. CLAY, Respondent. / Petitioner, a state prisoner proceeding pro se, brings this petition for a writ of habeas corpus pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 2254. The matter was referred to a United States Magistrate Judge pursuant to Eastern District of California local rules. On December 27, 2007, the magistrate judge filed findings and recommendations herein which were served on the parties and which contained notice that any objections to the findings and recommendations were to be filed within 20 days. Timely objections to the findings and recommendations have been filed. /// /// /// 1
Dockets.Justia.com
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
JACK BRENE KIRCH, Petitioner,
No. 2:07-cv-00928-MCE-CMK-P
ORDER ADOPTING FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATIONS
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26
In accordance with the provisions of 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)(C) and Local Rule 72-304, this court has conducted a de novo review of this case. Having carefully reviewed the entire file, the court finds the findings and recommendations to be supported by the record and by proper analysis. Accordingly, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that: 1. The findings and recommendations filed December 27, 2007 (Doc. 13), are
adopted in full; 2. 3. Defendant's motion to dismiss (Doc. 10) is granted; The Clerk of the Court is directed to enter judgment and close this file.
Dated: February 1, 2008 ________________________________ MORRISON C. ENGLAND, JR. UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE
2
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?