Coley v. Sisto et al

Filing 55

ORDER signed by Magistrate Judge George W. Foley on 4/17/2009 DENYING plaintiff's 53 Request for re-scheduled Telephonic Conference. (Marciel, M)

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 This matter is before the Court on Plaintiff's Request for Rescheduled Telephonic Conference (Dkt. #53), filed April 1, 2009. On February 5, 2009, the Court held a telephonic status conference, which Plaintiff was unable to attend due to medical issues. (See Minutes from Telephonic Conf., Dkt. #44). At the telephonic conference, the Court indicated that it would issue a written scheduling order, setting a 90 day discovery period. (See Scheduling Order, Dkt. #43). Thereafter, Plaintiff requested an additional telephonic conference and a clarification of the scheduling order. (See Dkt. #s 43, 45). The Court issued an Order of Clarification Regarding Discovery Deadlines on March 16, 2009 and indicated the Court would grant an additional telephonic conference if the parties required additional clarification. (Dkt. #51) (emphasis added). Plaintiff now submits an additional conference request, but fails to identify any need for a status conference. (Dkt. #53). Accordingly, ... ... ... ANDREW CALVIN COLEY, ) ) Plaintiff, ) ) v. ) ) DR. CASSIM, et al., ) ) Defendants. ) __________________________________________) Case No. 2:07-cv-00934-PMP-GWF ORDER

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

Plaintiff's Request for Rescheduled Telephonic Conference (Dkt. #53)

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28

IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that Plaintiff's Request for Rescheduled Telephonic Conference (Dkt. #53) is DENIED. DATED this 17th day of April, 2009.

GEORGE FOLEY, JR. United States Magistrate Judge

2