Ajaxo Inc. v. Bank of America Technology, et al

Filing 381

ORDER signed by Judge Garland E. Burrell, Jr. on 02/03/09 ORDERING that the 362 Motion to continue or stay trial is DENIED. (Benson, A.)

Download PDF
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 This matter was determined to be suitable for decision without oral argument. L.R. 78-230(h). 1 1 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA AJAXO, INC., a Delaware ) Corporation; K.C. MULTIMEDIA, INC.,) a Delaware Corporation, ) ) Plaintiffs, ) ) v. ) ) BANK OF AMERICA TECHNOLOGY AND ) OPERATIONS, INC., a Delaware ) Corporation; BANK OF AMERICA ) CORPORATION, a Delaware ) Corporation; BANK OF AMERICA ) NATIONAL ASSOCIATION; and ALLEN ) TAM, an individual, ) ) Defendants. ) ) 2:07-cv-00945-GEB-GGH ORDER1 Defendants move to continue or stay the trial scheduled to commence on March 9, 2009, until final judgment is entered in a related state trade secret action. Since the motion concerns pending copyright claims within the Court's exclusive federal jurisdiction, the motion is denied. See Minucci v. Agrama, 868 F.2d 1113, 1115 (9th Cir. 1989)(reversing district court's decision to stay a copyright action and holding "a district court has no discretion to stay 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 proceedings as to claims within exclusive federal jurisdiction"). See also Legal Economic Evaluations v. Metropolitan Life Ins. Co., 39 F.3d 951, 956 (9th Cir. 1994)(holding "binding Ninth Circuit precedent [ ] precludes Colorado River abstention where federal jurisdiction is exclusive"). Dated: February 3, 2009 GARLAND E. BURRELL, JR. United States District Judge 2

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?